CVE-2017-6742
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the SNMP implementation of could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of the affected system or to remotely execute code. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP packet to the affected device. The vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow in the affected code area. The vulnerability affects all versions of SNMP (versions 1, 2c, and 3). The attacker must know the SNMP read only community string (SNMP version 2c or earlier) or the user credentials (SNMPv3). An exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code and obtain full control of the system or to cause a reload of the affected system. Only traffic directed to the affected system can be used to exploit this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Cisco SNMP implementation allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause device reload via crafted SNMP packets. Affects SNMP versions 1, 2c, and 3. Requires attacker to know SNMP community string (v1/2c) or user credentials (v3).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.0, <= 12.4>= 15.0, <= 15.6>= 2.2.0, <= 3.17CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device OS and versionRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' to determine if the device runs Cisco iOS or IOS Xe and note the exact version numberAffected if The device runs Cisco iOS versions 12.0 through 12.4 or 15.0 through 15.6, or Cisco IOS Xe versions 2.2.0 through 3.17
-
Confirm SNMP is enabledRun 'show snmp' or 'show snmp group' to check if SNMP is configured and active on the deviceAffected if SNMP is enabled (any version: v1, v2c, or v3)
-
Check SNMP community strings or user accountsRun 'show snmp community' or 'show snmp user' to view configured SNMP community strings (for v1/v2c) or SNMPv3 usersAffected if Any SNMP community string or user account exists on the device
-
Determine SNMP access exposureReview the SNMP configuration with 'show run | include snmp' and check associated access control lists (ACLs) or interface bindings to see which networks can send SNMP packets to the deviceAffected if SNMP is accessible from untrusted or management networks beyond authorized admin stations
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable iOS (12.0-12.4 or 15.0-15.6) or IOS Xe (2.2.0-3.17) version AND has SNMP enabled with any configured community string or user credentials accessible to the attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco patches/updates for affected devices or implement access controls to restrict SNMP access to trusted management networks only.
iOS 15.7+ or iOS 12.5+; IOS XE 3.18+
- 1. Identify the exact Cisco device model and current iOS/IOS XE version using 'show version' command
- 2. For iOS: upgrade to a version higher than 12.4 (e.g., 15.7 or later) or higher than 15.6
- 3. For IOS XE: upgrade to a version higher than 3.17 (e.g., 3.18 or later)
- 4. Download the appropriate Cisco IOS/IOS XE image from Cisco.com/software
- 5. Verify the image integrity using MD5/SHA512 hash provided by Cisco
- 6. Copy the new image to flash memory using 'copy tftp flash'
- 7. Set the boot system to use the new image using 'boot system flash:<filename>'
- 8. Reload the device using 'reload' command
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,944.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6742 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6742 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data