CVE-2017-6780
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the TCP throttling process for Cisco IoT Field Network Director (IoT-FND) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the system to consume additional memory, eventually forcing the device to restart, aka Memory Exhaustion. The vulnerability is due to insufficient rate-limiting protection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a high rate of TCP packets to a specific group of open listening ports on a targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause the system to consume additional memory. If enough available memory is consumed, the system will restart, creating a temporary denial of service (DoS) condition. The DoS condition will end after the device has finished the restart process. This vulnerability affects the following Cisco products: Connected Grid Network Management System, if running a software release prior to IoT-FND Release 4.0; IoT Field Network Director, if running a software release prior to IoT-FND Release 4.0. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc77164.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory exhaustion vulnerability exists in Cisco IoT Field Network Director (IoT-FND) due to insufficient TCP rate-limiting protection. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a high rate of TCP packets to specific listening ports, causing excessive memory consumption that forces the device to restart, creating a temporary denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.0\(0.54\)<= 3.2.0-182CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco IoT-FND versionAccess the IoT-FND web interface and navigate to Administration > System Information, or use the CLI command 'show version' if available. Record the exact version number displayed.Affected if The version is 3.2.0-182 or earlier (any version up to and including 3.2.0-182)
-
Identify installed Cisco Connected Grid Network Management System versionAccess the CG-NMS web interface or use CLI to retrieve the version. Look for a version displayed as '3.0(0.54)' or earlier.Affected if The version is 3.0(0.54) or earlier
-
Identify listening TCP ports on the affected systemRun 'netstat -tuln' or 'ss -tuln' on the IoT-FND/CG-NMS server to list all listening TCP ports. Note the port numbers and their associated services.Affected if Any TCP ports are listening and accessible from the network (the vulnerability exploits any exposed listening port)
-
Check for signs of memory exhaustion or unexpected restartsReview system logs via 'grep -i error /var/log/messages' or check IoT-FND internal logs for memory-related errors, OOM (out of memory) messages, or unexpected service restarts.Affected if Memory exhaustion errors or unexplained service/device restarts are occurring
-
Verify network accessibility of the IoT-FND management interfaceConfirm that the IoT-FND management ports are accessible from untrusted networks by attempting TCP connections to common IoT-FND ports from an external host, or by reviewing firewall rules.Affected if IoT-FND ports are exposed to untrusted or external networks without adequate filtering
Your environment is affected if you are running Cisco IoT-FND version 3.2.0-182 or earlier, or Cisco Connected Grid Network Management System version 3.0(0.54) or earlier, and the management interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to IoT-FND Release 4.0 or later, which contains the fix for the insufficient rate-limiting protection. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider network-level filtering to limit suspicious TCP traffic to the affected ports.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6780 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6780 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data