FortiportalApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2017-7340

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-03-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPortal versions 4.0.0 and below allows an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via the applicationSearch parameter in the FortiView functionality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Fortinet FortiPortal versions 4.0.0 and below. The vulnerability is located in the applicationSearch parameter within the FortiView functionality. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript or HTML code through this parameter, which gets reflected back to users without proper sanitization, allowing execution of unauthorized client-side code in the context of affected users' sessions.

MitigationUpgrade FortiPortal to a version higher than 4.0.0 which contains the security patch. Additionally, implement robust input validation and output encoding on the applicationSearch parameter and all user-supplied inputs in the FortiView module to prevent XSS attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortiportalApplication
Affected:<= 4.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FortiPortal version
    Access the FortiPortal admin interface or check system information page for the installed version number. This is typically found in the About or System Settings section of the web UI.
    Affected if The displayed version number is 4.0.0 or lower.
  2. Verify FortiView module accessibility
    Log into FortiPortal and navigate to the FortiView functionality. Confirm the module is accessible to your user account.
    Affected if The FortiView module is present and accessible without additional security controls.
  3. Test applicationSearch parameter for XSS
    Using a browser or HTTP tool, submit a crafted request to the FortiView endpoint containing the applicationSearch parameter with a test XSS payload such as <script>alert(1)</script>. Observe whether the payload is reflected unescaped in the response.
    Affected if The payload is reflected back in the HTML output without encoding or sanitization.
  4. Check input validation settings
    Review FortiPortal configuration settings for the FortiView module, specifically looking for input validation or web application firewall settings related to the applicationSearch parameter.
    Affected if No input validation or output encoding is configured for the applicationSearch parameter.

You are affected if FortiPortal version is 4.0.0 or below AND the FortiView module with the applicationSearch parameter is accessible and reflects unsanitized input.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.0.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FortiPortal to a version higher than 4.0.0 which contains the security patch. Additionally, implement robust input validation and output encoding on the applicationSearch parameter and all user-supplied inputs in the FortiView module to prevent XSS attacks.

Fix this in Fortiportal Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7340 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7340 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data