CVE-2017-7420
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Authentication Bypass (CWE-287) vulnerability in ESMAC (aka Enterprise Server Monitor and Control) in Micro Focus Enterprise Developer and Enterprise Server 2.3 and earlier, 2.3 Update 1 before Hotfix 8, and 2.3 Update 2 before Hotfix 9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to view and alter configuration information and alter the state of the running product (CWE-275).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthentication bypass vulnerability in ESMAC (Enterprise Server Monitor and Control) web interface allows remote unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication controls and access configuration information and manipulate the running product state.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.3<= 2.3= 2.3all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Microfocus product and versionLocate the Enterprise Server, Enterprise Developer, or Enterprise Server Monitor and Control installation and determine the exact version number (for example, check the product About or version information in the installation directory)Affected if The installed version is Microfocus Enterprise Developer 2.3, Enterprise Server 2.3 or any version <= 2.3, or Enterprise Server Monitor and Control of any version
-
Verify ESMAC web interface is enabledCheck whether the ESMAC (Enterprise Server Monitor and Control) web interface service or component is installed and running on the system (typically accessible via a web port)Affected if ESMAC web interface is installed and accessible on the system
-
Confirm network accessibility of ESMACDetermine if the ESMAC web interface is exposed to network access, either locally or remotely (check listening ports and any firewall or access configuration)Affected if The ESMAC web interface is reachable over the network (local or remote)
-
Verify authentication is active on ESMACAttempt to access the ESMAC web interface without credentials to confirm whether authentication is properly enforcedAffected if Unauthenticated access to ESMAC is possible without being redirected to a login page or receiving an authentication error
You are affected if you have any version of Enterprise Server Monitor and Control, or Enterprise Server/Developer version 2.3 or lower, with the ESMAC web interface enabled and accessible, and unauthenticated access is possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied hotfixes: Hotfix 8 for Enterprise Server 2.3 Update 1, Hotfix 9 for Update 2, or upgrade to a patched version that includes the authentication fix.
- Identify the installed version and update level of Micro Focus Enterprise Developer or Enterprise Server (e.g., 2.3, 2.3 Update 1, or 2.3 Update 2)
- For Enterprise Developer or Enterprise Server 2.3 Update 1: Apply Hotfix 8 or later from Micro Focus support
- For Enterprise Developer or Enterprise Server 2.3 Update 2: Apply Hotfix 9 or later from Micro Focus support
- For Enterprise Server Monitor And Control (all versions): Apply the corresponding hotfix from Micro Focus support for the installed base version
- Restart the Enterprise Server services as required by the hotfix installation
- Verify the ESMAC interface is accessible only after proper authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7420 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7420 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data