ImanagerApplication · Novell

CVE-2017-7431

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-05-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Novell iManager 2.7.x before 2.7 SP7 Patch 10 HF1 and NetIQ iManager 3.x before 3.0.3.1 have persistent CSRF in object management.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Novell iManager 2.7.x before 2.7 SP7 Patch 10 HF1 and NetIQ iManager 3.x before 3.0.3.1 contain a persistent Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the object management functionality. This allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions on the iManager server, such as modifying or creating objects without their consent.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patches (2.7 SP7 Patch 10 HF1 for Novell iManager 2.7.x and 3.0.3.1 for NetIQ iManager 3.x) to address the CSRF vulnerability in object management.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ImanagerApplication
Affected:= 2.7
ImanagerApplication
Affected:= 3.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.2.1= 3.0.3= 3.0.3.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed iManager version
    Access the iManager web interface and navigate to the About or Help section, typically found at /nps/iam about or within the main login page footer. Alternatively, check configuration files in the iManager installation directory for version metadata.
    Affected if The version displayed is Novell iManager 2.7.x prior to SP7 Patch 10 HF1, or any of NetIQ iManager versions 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.2.1, 3.0.3, or 3.0.3.1.
  2. Confirm the iManager product variant
    Verify whether the installation is Novell iManager or NetIQ iManager by checking the product name displayed in the web interface login page or server documentation.
    Affected if The product is either Novell iManager 2.7.x or NetIQ iManager 3.x as listed in the affected versions.
  3. Verify object management functionality is accessible
    Log into the iManager console and confirm access to the Object management feature, typically found under the Object or Administration menu in the web interface.
    Affected if Authenticated users can access the object management interface, making the CSRF attack surface active.
  4. Check if the server is running and accessible
    Confirm the iManager server is operational and reachable over the network by attempting to access the login URL.
    Affected if The server is online and accepting authenticated sessions, which is required for the CSRF vulnerability to be exploitable.

You are affected if your installed iManager version matches Novell iManager 2.7.x before SP7 Patch 10 HF1 or any NetIQ iManager version 3.0 through 3.0.3.1, and the object management functionality is accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patches (2.7 SP7 Patch 10 HF1 for Novell iManager 2.7.x and 3.0.3.1 for NetIQ iManager 3.x) to address the CSRF vulnerability in object management.

Fix this in Imanager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7431 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7431 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data