CVE-2017-7494
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSamba since version 3.5.0 and before 4.6.4, 4.5.10 and 4.4.14 is vulnerable to remote code execution vulnerability, allowing a malicious client to upload a shared library to a writable share, and then cause the server to load and execute it.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA remote code execution vulnerability in Samba allows an authenticated attacker with write access to a shared folder to upload a malicious shared library (.so file) and trick the server into loading and executing it. The flaw exists because the server does not properly validate paths in the is_known_pipename() function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0>= 3.5.0, < 4.4.0>= 4.4.0, < 4.4.14>= 4.5.0, < 4.5.10>= 4.6.0, < 4.6.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Samba versionRun `smbd --version` or `rpm -q samba` (RHEL/CentOS) or `dpkg -l samba` (Debian)Affected if Version is 3.5.0 or higher but below 4.4.14, 4.5.10, or 4.6.4
-
Verify Samba service is runningRun `systemctl status smbd` or `service smb status`Affected if The smbd service is active and listening on ports 445/139
-
Identify writable sharesRun `smbclient -L localhost -U%` to list shares, then inspect /etc/samba/smb.conf for shares with `writeable = yes` or `read only = no`Affected if Any share is configured as writable (writeable = yes or read only = no)
-
Confirm NT pipe support is enabledCheck /etc/samba/smb.conf for the `nt pipe support = yes` setting (this is the default)Affected if `nt pipe support` is not explicitly set to `no` (default allows exploitation)
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Samba version (3.5.0 to 4.4.13, 4.5.0 to 4.5.9, or 4.6.0 to 4.6.3), has the Samba service active, and exposes at least one writable share with NT pipe support enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.4.04.4.144.5.10
Upgrade Samba to version 4.6.4, 4.5.10, or 4.4.14 or later. Additionally, restrict write permissions on shares and disable anonymous access to limit exposure.
Samba 4.6.4 or later, 4.5.10 or later, or 4.4.14 or later (or Samba 4.7.0+)
- 1. Identify the current Samba version by running: smbd --version or dpkg -l | grep samba
- 2. For Debian 8.0, run: apt-get update && apt-get install samba (to apply available security updates)
- 3. If the package manager does not provide a fixed version, download and compile Samba 4.6.4, 4.5.10, or 4.4.14 (or later) from the official Samba website at https://www.samba.org/
- 4. After upgrading, restart the Samba services: systemctl restart smbd nmbd (or service smbd restart on older systems)
- 5. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed releases: smbd --version
- 6. Ensure the server is not configured with writeable shares exposed to untrusted users, as a defense-in-depth measure until the upgrade is complete
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,592.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7494 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.samba.org
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.samba.org
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- download.schneider-electric.com
- h20566.www2.hpe.com
- h20566.www2.hpe.com
- security.gentoo.org
- security.netapp.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7494 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data