AnsibleApplication · Redhat

CVE-2017-7550

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2017-11-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.3.3 / 2.4.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in the way Ansible (2.3.x before 2.3.3, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1) passed certain parameters to the jenkins_plugin module. Remote attackers could use this flaw to expose sensitive information from a remote host's logs. This flaw was fixed by not allowing passwords to be specified in the "params" argument, and noting this in the module documentation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The jenkins_plugin module in Ansible versions 2.3.x before 2.3.3 and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 was passing certain parameters (including passwords) directly to the underlying Jenkins API, which caused these sensitive values to be written to remote host logs. This allowed remote attackers with access to those logs to obtain credentials and other sensitive information.

MitigationUpgrade Ansible to version 2.3.3 or later for the 2.3 branch, or 2.4.1 or later for the 2.4 branch. Alternatively, review all playbooks using the jenkins_plugin module and ensure passwords are not passed through the 'params' argument; use the dedicated 'params' field or environment variables instead.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AnsibleApplication
Affected:>= 2.3.0, < 2.3.3>= 2.4.0, < 2.4.1
Enterprise Linux ServerOperating system
Affected:= 7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Ansible version
    Run command: ansible --version or ansible-playbook --version
    Affected if Version is >= 2.3.0 and < 2.3.3, or >= 2.4.0 and < 2.4.1
  2. Find playbooks using jenkins_plugin module
    Search playbook files for 'jenkins_plugin' module usage, for example: grep -r 'jenkins_plugin' /path/to/playbooks/
    Affected if Any playbook uses the jenkins_plugin module
  3. Inspect jenkins_plugin usage for exposed passwords
    Review identified playbooks and check if the 'params' argument contains sensitive values like passwords or API keys directly
    Affected if Passwords or sensitive parameters are passed directly through the 'params' argument in jenkins_plugin tasks
  4. Search logs for leaked credentials
    Examine remote host logs (such as /var/log/messages, /var/log/ansible.log, or journalctl) for instances where password or sensitive parameter values appear in plain text
    Affected if Plain-text passwords or sensitive values appear in logs on managed hosts

A user is affected if they run a vulnerable Ansible version (2.3.0-2.3.2 or 2.4.0) AND use the jenkins_plugin module with sensitive parameters passed through the 'params' argument, potentially leaking those values to host logs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.3.3 / 2.4.1 or later
Fixed in 2.3.32.4.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Ansible to version 2.3.3 or later for the 2.3 branch, or 2.4.1 or later for the 2.4 branch. Alternatively, review all playbooks using the jenkins_plugin module and ensure passwords are not passed through the 'params' argument; use the dedicated 'params' field or environment variables instead.

Recommended fix High confidence

Ansible 2.3.3 or 2.4.1 (or later stable releases)

  1. 1. Check current Ansible version: ansible --version
  2. 2. If running Ansible 2.3.x (versions 2.3.0 through 2.3.2), upgrade to Ansible 2.3.3 or later
  3. 3. If running Ansible 2.4.x (versions 2.4.0), upgrade to Ansible 2.4.1 or later
  4. 4. If using the jenkins_plugin module, ensure passwords are passed via the dedicated 'password' parameter rather than the 'params' argument
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade: ansible --version
Caveat Users passing passwords via the 'params' argument in jenkins_plugin must migrate to using the dedicated 'password' parameter

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ansible Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7550 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7550 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data