CVE-2017-7683
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 displays Tomcat version and detailed error stack trace, which is not secure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 exposes Tomcat version information and detailed error stack traces through error pages, allowing attackers to gather intelligence about the system infrastructure and potentially identify vulnerable components.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0= 2.0= 2.1= 2.1.1= 2.2.0= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.3= 3.0.4= 3.0.5= 3.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache OpenMeetings installationLocate the OpenMeetings web application in your environment - typically deployed as a WAR file or standalone installation under the web server document rootAffected if OpenMeetings is present on the system
-
Determine installed OpenMeetings versionCheck the version of the installed Apache OpenMeetings instance - this is usually displayed on the login page, in the application header, or in the about/admin section of the applicationAffected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions: 1.0.0, 2.0, 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.2.0, 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.0.4, 3.0.5, or 3.0.6
-
Trigger an error condition to observe responseSend a malformed request to the OpenMeetings server (such as requesting a non-existent page, submitting invalid input, or causing an application error) and capture the HTTP responseAffected if The error response contains detailed Java stack traces, exception messages, or internal framework details
-
Inspect HTTP response headers for version disclosureUse a tool like curl with the -I flag to examine the HTTP response headers returned by the serverAffected if The Server header or other headers disclose the Tomcat version number
-
Check server error page configurationExamine the Tomcat server configuration files (typically server.xml) and the web.xml deployment descriptor for custom error handler mappingsAffected if Custom error handlers are not configured or are set to show verbose error pages instead of generic messages
You are affected if Apache OpenMeetings versions 1.0.0 through 3.0.6 are installed AND error responses expose stack traces or Tomcat version information in headers or pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataConfigure custom error handlers to suppress stack traces and disable server version disclosure in Tomcat server configuration.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7683 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7683 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data