CVE-2017-7691
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA code injection vulnerability exists in SAP TREX / Business Warehouse Accelerator (BWA). The vendor response is SAP Security Note 2419592.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA code injection vulnerability in SAP TREX / Business Warehouse Accelerator (BWA) allows remote attackers to inject malicious code. The critical CVSS score of 9.8 indicates potential for complete system compromise without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if SAP TREX is installedCheck for TREX installation directories (typically under /usr/sap/<SID>/TREX or C:\Program Files\SAP\TREX) and look for TREX-related processes (trex*, trexd, trexindexserver)Affected if SAP TREX software is present on the system
-
Identify if Business Warehouse Accelerator is runningCheck for BWA processes (bwaccel*, bwa*) and services, typically on ports 5100-5103 or custom ports configured during installationAffected if BWA processes or services are running
-
Verify TREX/BWA network exposureUse netstat or similar tools to check if TREX/BWA ports (commonly 5100-5103, 8000-8004, 3300-3399 for TREX) are listening on non-loopback interfaces or publicly accessibleAffected if TREX/BWA services are exposed to network addresses other than localhost
-
Check for unauthorized access indicatorsReview TREX/BWA log files (under <TREX_install>/log directory) for unexpected commands, suspicious query patterns, or unknown admin accessAffected if Logs show unexpected commands, unauthorized access attempts, or signs of code injection
If SAP TREX or BWA is installed and network-accessible, the environment is affected since all versions contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply SAP Security Note 2419592 to patch the vulnerability. Restrict network access to TREX/BWA services and monitor for indicators of compromise until the patch is applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7691 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7691 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data