CVE-2017-7798
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Developer Tools feature suffers from a XUL injection vulnerability due to improper sanitization of the web page source code. In the worst case, this could allow arbitrary code execution when opening a malicious page with the style editor tool. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 52.3 and Firefox < 55.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Firefox Developer Tools (specifically the Style Editor) has a XUL injection vulnerability due to improper sanitization of web page source code. When a user opens a malicious page in the Style Editor, the unsanitized content can be injected into the XUL interface, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.0= 7.0= 7.3= 7.4= 7.3= 7.4= 7.5= 6.0= 7.0< 55.0< 52.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Firefox is installedCheck for Firefox installation. On Debian-based systems: dpkg -l | grep -i firefox. On RHEL-based systems: rpm -qa | grep -i firefox. On any system: which firefox or find /usr -name 'firefox' 2>/dev/nullAffected if Firefox is not found on the system (not affected because the vulnerable software is not present)
-
Determine installed Firefox versionRun: firefox --version or firefox -v. For package-based installation: dpkg -s firefox (Debian) or rpm -qi firefox (RHEL). Record the exact version numberAffected if Version is less than 52.3.0 (for ESR builds) OR less than 55.0 (for standard releases)
-
Identify Firefox package type and sourceCheck if this is an ESR (Extended Support Release) version. Run: firefox --version and look for 'ESR' in output, or check package name: dpkg -l firefox-esr (Debian) or rpm -qa | grep firefox-esr (RHEL)Affected if The installed version is an ESR version below 52.3.0, or a standard version below 55.0, and matches the affected Red Hat or Debian distributions listed
-
Confirm Style Editor accessibilityThe Style Editor is part of Firefox Developer Tools, enabled by default. Verify Developer Tools are available by pressing F12 or Ctrl+Shift+I in Firefox, then clicking the Style Editor tab. No configuration check needed as this is a built-in featureAffected if Firefox version is vulnerable AND Developer Tools/Style Editor can be accessed (default enabled in all affected versions)
-
Check system OS version for Red Hat or DebianOn RHEL: cat /etc/redhat-release. On Debian: cat /etc/debian_version. Confirm the system is Debian 8.0/9.0 or RHEL 6.x/7.x as listed in affected productsAffected if Running an affected OS version (Debian 8.0, 9.0, RHEL 6.x, 7.x) with a vulnerable Firefox version installed
You are affected if Firefox is installed with a version below 52.3.0 (ESR) or below 55.0 (standard) on a Debian 8.0/9.0 or RHEL 6.x/7.x system, and the Style Editor (Developer Tools) feature is accessible (which it is by default).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data52.3.055.0
Update Firefox to version 52.3 (ESR) or version 55 or later to obtain the patched version that properly sanitizes web page source code before rendering in the Developer Tools.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7798 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7798 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data