CVE-2017-7826
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory safety bugs were reported in Firefox 56 and Firefox ESR 52.4. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort that some of these could be exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 57, Firefox ESR < 52.5, and Thunderbird < 52.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory safety vulnerabilities in Firefox and Thunderbird allowed memory corruption that could potentially be exploited to execute arbitrary code. The bugs were present in the browser engine and related to improper memory handling in Firefox 56 and Firefox ESR 52.4.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 6.0= 7.0= 6.0= 7.0= 7.4= 7.4= 7.5= 6.0= 7.0= 17.10= 18.04< 57.0< 52.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Mozilla Firefox is installedOn Windows, check Program Files or Program Files (x86) for Mozilla Firefox folder. On Linux, run 'which firefox' or check /usr/bin/firefox. On macOS, check /Applications for Firefox.appAffected if Firefox is installed and running a version below 57.0 or below 52.5.0 for ESR releases
-
Determine installed Firefox versionOn Windows, open Firefox, click menu > Help > About Firefox. On Linux terminal, run 'firefox --version' or check the package with 'rpm -q firefox' (RHEL) or 'dpkg -l firefox' (Debian/Ubuntu). On macOS, right-click Firefox.app > Get InfoAffected if The displayed version number is less than 57.0 for standard releases or less than 52.5.0 for ESR releases
-
Check if Thunderbird is installedOn Windows, check Program Files for Mozilla Thunderbird. On Linux, run 'which thunderbird' or check /usr/bin/thunderbird. On macOS, check /Applications for Thunderbird.appAffected if Thunderbird is installed and runs a version that shares the vulnerable engine code (implied affected based on CVE summary mentioning Thunderbird)
-
Verify distribution package versions on LinuxFor RHEL/CentOS: 'rpm -qa | grep -i firefox'. For Debian/Ubuntu: 'dpkg -l | grep -i firefox'. Compare output to known affected versions: Debian 7.x/8.x/9.x, RHEL 6.x/7.x, Ubuntu 17.10/18.04Affected if The installed package version corresponds to the listed affected Debian, RHEL, or Ubuntu versions that ship vulnerable Firefox versions
A user is affected if they run Firefox version below 57.0 (or below 52.5.0 for ESR) or Thunderbird sharing the same vulnerable engine, particularly on the listed Linux distributions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped52.5.057.0
Upgrade immediately to Firefox 57+, Firefox ESR 52.5+, or Thunderbird 52.5+ to patch the memory corruption vulnerabilities. Given the CVSS 9.8 severity and potential for arbitrary code execution, this should be prioritized as an urgent patch.
Firefox 57.0 or later / Firefox ESR 52.5.0 or later
- Back up bookmarks, passwords, and any essential browser data before upgrading
- Update Firefox to version 57.0 or later (or Firefox ESR 52.5.0 or later for enterprise deployments)
- Restart the browser to complete the update
- Verify the update by checking Help > About Firefox to confirm the version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7826 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7826 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data