Emc M\&rApplication · Dell

CVE-2017-8012

HIGH · 7.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2017-09-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.0.2 or later.
See remediation →
83/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In EMC ViPR SRM, Storage M&R, VNX M&R, and M&R (Watch4Net) for SAS Solution Packs, the Java Management Extensions (JMX) protocol used to communicate between components in the Alerting and/or Compliance components can be leveraged to create a denial of service (DoS) condition. Attackers with knowledge of JMX agent user credentials could potentially exploit this vulnerability to create arbitrary files on the affected system and create a DoS condition by leveraging inherent JMX protocol capabilities.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

In EMC ViPR SRM and related M&R products, the Java Management Extensions (JMX) protocol used between Alerting and/or Compliance components has an authenticated vulnerability. Attackers with JMX agent credentials can leverage inherent JMX protocol capabilities to create arbitrary files on the affected system and cause denial of service.

MitigationRestrict JMX access by implementing strong, unique credentials, enabling SSL/TLS for JMX communications, and applying network segmentation to limit JMX exposure to trusted systems only. Consider disabling JMX if not required for operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Emc M\&rApplication
Affected:all versions
Emc Storage Monitoring And ReportingApplication
Affected:all versions
Emc Vipr SrmApplication
Affected:<= 4.0.2
Emc Vnx Monitoring And ReportingApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if affected EMC product is installed
    Look for installed EMC ViPR SRM, M&R, Storage Monitoring And Reporting, or VNX Monitoring And Reporting components. Check common installation directories or use system inventory tools to list installed software.
    Affected if One of these products is present on the system
  2. Determine installed product version
    Locate version information in the product's installation directory, typically in a version.txt, about.txt, or similar file, or check the product's web interface for version details.
    Affected if Version is at or below 4.0.2 for ViPR SRM, or is any version for M&R, Storage M&R, or VNX M&R products
  3. Verify if JMX service is enabled
    Check the product configuration for JMX settings. Look for JMX port configurations (typically ports 8686 or 1099) in configuration files or running process listings.
    Affected if JMX is enabled and listening on a network port
  4. Check JMX authentication configuration
    Review JMX configuration files for authentication settings. Verify whether default, weak, or shared credentials may be in use.
    Affected if JMX authentication is enabled but uses default or weak credentials
  5. Confirm JMX network exposure
    Determine if the JMX port is bound to a non-localhost interface or is accessible from untrusted networks.
    Affected if JMX service is accessible from network addresses other than localhost

User is affected if any of the listed products are installed with JMX enabled and accessible, regardless of version since most versions are affected.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.0.2
Interim mitigation

Restrict JMX access by implementing strong, unique credentials, enabling SSL/TLS for JMX communications, and applying network segmentation to limit JMX exposure to trusted systems only. Consider disabling JMX if not required for operations.

Fix this in Emc M\&r Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,608.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8012 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8012 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data