CVE-2017-8023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEMC NetWorker may potentially be vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the Networker Client execution service (nsrexecd) when oldauth authentication method is used. An unauthenticated remote attacker could send arbitrary commands via RPC service to be executed on the host system with the privileges of the nsrexecd service, which runs with administrative privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEMC NetWorker nsrexecd service uses an insecure 'oldauth' authentication method that allows unauthenticated attackers to send arbitrary commands via RPC. The service runs with administrative privileges, enabling complete host compromise without any credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.2.0.0, < 8.2.4.11>= 9.0.0.0, <= 9.0.1.9>= 9.1.0.0, < 9.1.1.5>= 9.2.0.0, < 9.2.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetWorker versionRun 'nsr version' from the NetWorker bin directory, or check the installed packages via system package manager, or look in the NetWorker installation directory for a version fileAffected if the installed version falls within any of these ranges: 8.2.0.0 through 8.2.4.10, 9.0.0.0 through 9.0.1.9, 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.1.4, or 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.x
-
Verify nsrexecd service is runningCheck for the nsrexecd process running on the system using 'ps aux | grep nsrexecd' on Unix/Linux or check the Windows service list for 'NetWorker Remote Execution Service'Affected if the nsrexecd service is active and listening on RPC ports (typically port 7937 or dynamic RPC ports)
-
Confirm oldauth authentication is enabledInspect the NetWorker configuration file (typically nsrla.res or the auth section in NetWorker configuration) for the 'oldauth' or 'authentication' directive, or use the NetWorker admin tool to view authentication methodsAffected if the 'oldauth' authentication method is explicitly enabled or allowed in the NetWorker configuration
You are affected if you have a vulnerable NetWorker version (8.2.x before 8.2.4.11, 9.0.x through 9.0.1.9, 9.1.x before 9.1.1.5, or 9.2.x before 9.2.1.0) AND the nsrexecd service is running with oldauth authentication enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.2.4.119.1.1.59.2.1.0
Disable the oldauth authentication method in NetWorker configuration and ensure nsrexecd does not run with administrative privileges, or block the RPC service port at the network perimeter.
8.2.4.11 (8.2.x branch), 9.0.1.10 (9.0.x branch), 9.1.1.5 (9.1.x branch), or 9.2.1.0 (9.2.x branch) depending on your current major version
- 1. Identify the currently installed EMC Networker version using 'nsrinfo -v' or checking the installation logs
- 2. Determine which version branch your installation belongs to (8.2.x, 9.0.x, 9.1.x, or 9.2.x)
- 3. For version 8.2.x: Upgrade to version 8.2.4.11 or later
- 4. For version 9.0.x: Upgrade to version 9.0.1.10 or later
- 5. For version 9.1.x: Upgrade to version 9.1.1.5 or later
- 6. For version 9.2.x: Upgrade to version 9.2.1.0 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify the nsrexecd service is running the patched version by checking 'nsradmin -s server -p nsrexecd'
- 8. Consider reviewing and disabling the oldauth authentication method in nsr as a secondary hardening measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data