CVE-2017-8028
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Pivotal Spring-LDAP versions 1.3.0 - 2.3.1, when connected to some LDAP servers, when no additional attributes are bound, and when using LDAP BindAuthenticator with org.springframework.ldap.core.support.DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy as the authentication strategy, and setting userSearch, authentication is allowed with an arbitrary password when the username is correct. This occurs because some LDAP vendors require an explicit operation for the LDAP bind to take effect.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Pivotal Spring-LDAP versions 1.3.0 through 2.3.1, a vulnerability exists in the LDAP BindAuthenticator when using DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy with userSearch. When connected to certain LDAP servers and when no additional attributes are bound, the authentication incorrectly accepts any password as long as the username is correct. This occurs because some LDAP vendors require an explicit operation for the LDAP bind to take effect, and this explicit operation is not being performed in the affected configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 1.3.0= 1.3.1= 1.3.2= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.0.2= 2.0.3= 2.0.4= 2.1.0= 2.2.0= 2.2.1= 2.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Spring-LDAP versionExamine your project's dependency management (Maven pom.xml, Gradle build.gradle, or JAR manifest) to locate the spring-ldap-core library versionAffected if The version falls within 1.3.0 through 2.3.1 (including 1.3.0, 1.3.1, 1.3.2, 2.0.0 through 2.0.4, 2.1.0, 2.2.0, 2.2.1, 2.3.0)
-
Verify DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy is in useSearch your codebase and configuration files for any references to DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy, commonly found in LDAP context configuration XML files or Java configuration classesAffected if DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy is explicitly configured and in use
-
Confirm userSearch is configuredSearch your LDAP authentication configuration for userSearchBase and userSearchFilter settings, which indicate the use of userSearch for LDAP authenticationAffected if The BindAuthenticator is configured with userSearch for querying user credentials
-
Check for additional attribute bindingInspect your LDAP context source configuration to see if custom attributes are being bound during authentication (search for attribute mapping or additional context attributes)Affected if No additional attributes are being bound during the LDAP bind operation
You are affected if your environment uses Spring-LDAP versions 1.3.0 through 2.3.1 AND combines DefaultTlsDirContextAuthenticationStrategy with userSearch without any additional attribute binding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Spring-LDAP to a patched version (2.3.2 or later) that addresses this authentication bypass. Alternatively, review LDAP authentication configuration and ensure proper bind operations are being executed, or switch to a different authentication strategy if upgrade is not immediately feasible.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8028 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8028 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data