CVE-2017-8110
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedwww.modified-shop.org modified eCommerce Shopsoftware 2.0.2.2 rev 10690 has XXE in api/it-recht-kanzlei/api-it-recht-kanzlei.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceXML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in the it-recht-kanzlei API endpoint (api/it-recht-kanzlei/api-it-recht-kanzlei.php) of modified eCommerce Shopsoftware version 2.0.2.2 rev 10690 allows attackers to interfere with XML processing, potentially accessing local files or performing Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the installed Modified eCommerce Shopsoftware versionCheck the version file or admin panel for the exact version number. Common locations include a version.php file in the includes/ directory or the admin backend system info page.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.0.2.2 (rev 10690)
-
Locate the it-recht-kanzlei API endpoint fileSearch for the file api/it-recht-kanzlei/api-it-recht-kanzlei.php in the web root directory.Affected if The file api/it-recht-kanzlei/api-it-recht-kanzlei.php exists on the server
-
Confirm the API endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the URL path /api/it-recht-kanzlei/api-it-recht-kanzlei.php via HTTP request to verify the endpoint responds.Affected if The API endpoint is reachable and responds to requests
You are affected if you are running Modified eCommerce Shopsoftware version 2.0.2.2 (rev 10690) AND the api/it-recht-kanzlei/api-it-recht-kanzlei.php file exists and is accessible on your server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable external entity processing and XML entity expansion in the PHP XML parser configuration for the affected API endpoint, or implement proper input validation and sanitization for XML data.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8110 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8110 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data