NetecoApplication · Huawei

CVE-2017-8133

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Huawei iManager NetEco with software V600R008C00 and V600R008C10 has a command injection vulnerability. An authenticated, remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to send malicious packets to a target device. Successful exploit could enable a low privileged user to execute commands that a high privileged user could execute, causing the files to be tampered with or deleted.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Huawei iManager NetEco versions V600R008C00 and V600R008C10 contain a command injection vulnerability allowing authenticated remote attackers to send malicious packets. Successful exploitation enables a low-privileged user to execute commands with high-privileged access, resulting in potential file tampering or deletion.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch for this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict network access to the iManager NetEco management interface to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious command execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
NetecoApplication
Affected:= v600r008c00= v600r008c10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify NetEco product and version
    Locate the iManager NetEco installation and check the version information, typically found in the product about page, installation directory, or system information panel. Confirm the exact version is V600R008C00 or V600R008C10.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly V600R008C00 or V600R008C10
  2. Confirm management interface accessibility
    Determine if the NetEco web management interface (typically on port 8080 or 8443) is exposed to network accessible systems. Check firewall rules, NAT configurations, or reverse proxy settings that expose this interface.
    Affected if The management interface is reachable from untrusted or external networks
  3. Review user account privileges
    Examine the user accounts configured in NetEco to identify any low-privileged accounts that should not have elevated access. Check user role assignments and permission configurations.
    Affected if Low-privileged user accounts exist in the system and can access the management interface
  4. Inspect system logs for suspicious commands
    Review NetEco system logs, audit logs, and operating system command logs for unexpected or unauthorized command executions, especially those involving file operations or system modifications.
    Affected if Logs contain command executions that were not initiated by known administrators or that involve file tampering or deletion

You are affected if Huawei iManager NetEco version V600R008C00 or V600R008C10 is installed and its management interface is network-accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch for this vulnerability. Until patched, restrict network access to the iManager NetEco management interface to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious command execution.

Fix this in Neteco Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
26.0 hours of engineering $4,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,296.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8133 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8133 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data