CVE-2017-8134
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe FusionSphere OpenStack with software V100R006C00 and V100R006C10 has a command injection vulnerability due to the insufficient input validation on four TCP listening ports. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the vulnerabilities to gain root privileges by sending some messages with malicious commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in Huawei FusionSphere OpenStack V100R006C00 and V100R006C10 allows unauthenticated attackers to gain root privileges via malicious commands sent to four TCP listening ports due to insufficient input validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v100r006c00= v100r006c10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FusionSphere OpenStack versionRun 'nova version' or check the installed package version using the package manager (e.g., rpm -qa | grep -i fusionSphere or dpkg -l | grep -i fusionSphere). Also check /opt/fusionsphere/ or /usr/fusionsphere/ for version files if they exist.Affected if The installed version is v100r006c00 or v100r006c10.
-
Locate the vulnerable service componentsSearch for processes listening on TCP ports that handle command execution or system operations. Use 'netstat -tulpn' or 'ss -tulpn' to list all listening TCP ports and identify any FusionSphere-related services.Affected if The vulnerable service component is running and listening on one or more TCP ports.
-
Verify network exposure of listening TCP portsCheck if the FusionSphere management or API ports are exposed externally. Review firewall rules using 'iptables -L -n' or 'firewall-cmd --list-all'. Verify network interface bindings with 'ss -tulpn' to see if ports bind to 0.0.0.0 versus localhost.Affected if The affected TCP ports are bound to 0.0.0.0 or an external IP, making them reachable from untrusted networks.
-
Inspect service configuration for input validationExamine configuration files in /opt/fusionsphere/ or /etc/fusionsphere/ related to the listening service. Look for parameters controlling input sanitization or command execution. If source code or logs are accessible, review them for lack of input validation routines.Affected if The service configuration lacks input validation controls or the code contains unsafe command execution functions.
You are affected if FusionSphere OpenStack version is exactly V100R006C00 or V100R006C10 AND the vulnerable service TCP ports are exposed and accepting unauthenticated input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches or upgrade to a patched version of FusionSphere OpenStack; if no patch available, implement network segmentation to restrict access to the affected TCP ports and deploy WAF rules to filter malicious input.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8134 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8134 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data