CVE-2017-8144
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHonor 5A,Honor 8 Lite,Mate9,Mate9 Pro,P10,P10 Plus Huawei smartphones with software the versions before CAM-L03C605B143CUSTC605D003,the versions before Prague-L03C605B161,the versions before Prague-L23C605B160,the versions before MHA-AL00C00B225,the versions before LON-AL00C00B225,the versions before VTR-AL00C00B167,the versions before VTR-TL00C01B167,the versions before VKY-AL00C00B167,the versions before VKY-TL00C01B167 have a resource exhaustion vulnerability due to configure setting. An attacker tricks a user into installing a malicious application, the application may turn on the device flash-light and rapidly drain the device battery.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA configuration vulnerability in multiple Huawei smartphone models allows a malicious application to access and control the device flashlight (torch) without proper restrictions, leading to rapid battery drain through sustained flashlight activation - a form of resource exhaustion DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< cam-l03c605b143custc605d003< prague-l03c605b161< prague-l23c605b160< mha-al00c00b225< lon-al00c00b225< vtr-al00c00b167< vtr-tl00c01b167< vky-al00c00b167< vky-tl00c01b167CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelGo to Settings > About Phone > Model Number (or use 'getprop ro.product.model' via ADB)Affected if Model is Honor 5a, Honor 8 Lite, Mate 9, Mate 9 Pro, P10, or P10 Plus
-
Check Honor 5a firmware versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Build Number (or use 'getprop ro.build.version.emui' via ADB). Compare against cam-l03c605b143custc605d003Affected if Device is Honor 5a and firmware version is lower than cam-l03c605b143custc605d003
-
Check Honor 8 Lite firmware versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Build Number (or use 'getprop ro.build.version.emui' via ADB). Compare against prague-l03c605b161 (for L03) or prague-l23c605b160 (for L23)Affected if Device is Honor 8 Lite and firmware version is lower than prague-l03c605b161 or prague-l23c605b160
-
Check Mate 9 firmware versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Build Number (or use 'getprop ro.build.version.emui' via ADB). Compare against mha-al00c00b225Affected if Device is Mate 9 and firmware version is lower than mha-al00c00b225
-
Check Mate 9 Pro firmware versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Build Number (or use 'getprop ro.build.version.emui' via ADB). Compare against lon-al00c00b225Affected if Device is Mate 9 Pro and firmware version is lower than lon-al00c00b225
-
Check P10 and P10 Plus firmware versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Build Number (or use 'getprop ro.build.version.emui' via ADB). For P10 compare against vtr-al00c00b167 (AL00) or vtr-tl00c01b167 (TL00). For P10 Plus compare against vky-al00c00b167 or vky-tl00c01b167Affected if Device is P10 (lower than vtr-al00c00b167 or vtr-tl00c01b167) or P10 Plus (lower than vky-al00c00b167 or vky-tl00c01b167)
Device is affected if it is one of the listed Huawei models and its firmware version is lower than the specified version for that model.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUsers should avoid installing applications from untrusted sources. Organizations should deploy MDM policies to restrict application permissions and monitor for battery drain anomalies. Huawei should release firmware updates to implement proper flashlight API access controls and usage timeouts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8144 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8144 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data