FusionsphereOperating system · Huawei

CVE-2017-8198

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
FusionSphere V100R006C00SPC102(NFV) has an SQL injection vulnerability. An authenticated, remote attacker could craft interface messages carrying malicious SQL statements and send them to a target device. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to launch an SQL injection attack and execute SQL commands.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

FusionSphere V100R006C00SPC102(NFV) contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in its interface messaging system. An attacker with valid credentials can send specially crafted messages containing malicious SQL statements that get executed in the backend database, potentially allowing data exfiltration or database compromise.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches for CVE-2017-8198. If no patch available, implement input validation and parameterized queries on all interface message handlers to prevent SQL injection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FusionsphereOperating system
Affected:= v100r006c00spc102\(nfv\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify FusionSphere version
    Check the installed FusionSphere V100R006C00SPC102 version via system management interface, command line tools, or product documentation. Typically found in 'about' section, version info panel, or by running: display version or show version command in the FusionSphere management system.
    Affected if Installed version is exactly v100r006c00spc102(nfv)
  2. Confirm NFV variant
    Verify the specific variant is the NFV (Network Functions Virtualization) edition. This can be confirmed in the product model or edition field of the system information.
    Affected if Product edition shows as NFV variant
  3. Check interface messaging system status
    Locate the interface messaging system configuration in FusionSphere management console or configuration files. Look for settings related to 'interface messaging', 'message handler', or 'API messaging' in the system modules.
    Affected if Interface messaging system is enabled and configured
  4. Assess network exposure
    Review network accessibility of the management interface and messaging APIs. Check firewall rules, ACLs, and exposure to network segments for the ports used by the interface messaging system.
    Affected if Management interface with messaging functionality is accessible from untrusted networks
  5. Review audit and database logs
    Examine FusionSphere audit logs and database logs for suspicious SQL patterns in interface message handler invocations. Look for unusual query patterns or unexpected SQL syntax in message processing logs.
    Affected if SQL injection indicators found in logs or unexpected query patterns in message handler logs

Environment is affected only if running exactly the v100r006c00spc102(nfv) version AND the interface messaging system is enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches for CVE-2017-8198. If no patch available, implement input validation and parameterized queries on all interface message handlers to prevent SQL injection.

Fix this in Fusionsphere Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8198 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8198 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data