CVE-2017-8276
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper authorization involving a fuse in TrustZone in snapdragon automobile, snapdragon mobile and snapdragon wear in versions MDM9206, MDM9607, MSM8996AU, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 410/12, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 632, SD 636, SD 650/52, SD 810, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SDA660, SDM439, SDM630, SDM660, SDX24, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis vulnerability involves improper authorization checks for eFuse access within Qualcomm's TrustZone secure execution environment. TrustZone creates a 'secure world' for sensitive operations, and eFuses are one-time programmable memory cells storing encryption keys and security configurations. The improper authorization could allow bypass of security controls, potentially enabling access to sensitive cryptographic material or modification of security settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelExamine system information, device diagnostics, or hardware specifications to determine the exact Qualcomm chip (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Msm8996au, SD 210, SD 212, SD 205, SD 410, or SD 412) present in the deviceAffected if The chipset matches any of the following: Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Msm8996au, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 410, or Sd 412
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the device's modem or system firmware version through diagnostic tools, AT commands (for modems), or system information utilities. Compare the installed firmware version against the affected product listAffected if The device firmware matches any of the listed affected products (all versions of Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Msm8996au, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 410, Sd 412)
-
Verify TrustZone is enabledCheck system security settings or boot configuration to confirm the TrustZone secure execution environment is active on the deviceAffected if TrustZone is enabled and the chipset is one of the affected models (the vulnerability exists in the TrustZone eFuse authorization logic)
-
Inspect eFuse configuration accessExamine security logs or diagnostic outputs for eFuse read/write operations to determine if unauthorized access patterns exist or if security controls are being bypassedAffected if eFuse access controls are present and the device runs on any affected Qualcomm firmware version
The device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Msm8996au, SD 210, SD 212, SD 205, SD 410, SD 412) with TrustZone and eFuse functionality enabled, as all firmware versions of these products contain the improper authorization vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware patches from Qualcomm and device OEMs. Since this is a hardware/firmware-level issue in TrustZone, users must obtain and install firmware updates from their device manufacturers. No workarounds exist for improper authorization in secure boot/fuse logic.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8276 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data