CVE-2017-9151
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedlibautotrace.a in AutoTrace 0.31.1 has a heap-based buffer overflow in the pnm_load_ascii function in input-pnm.c:303:12.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow exists in the pnm_load_ascii function within input-pnm.c of AutoTrace 0.31.1's libautotrace.a library. The vulnerability occurs at line 303:12 when processing ASCII-formatted PNM (portable anymap) image files, likely due to insufficient bounds checking when reading pixel data into a heap-allocated buffer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.31.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if AutoTrace is installedRun 'autotrace --version' or check for the presence of the autotrace binary in common paths (/usr/bin/autotrace, /usr/local/bin/autotrace)Affected if AutoTrace version 0.31.1 is returned or the binary exists without a version higher than 0.31.1
-
Locate the vulnerable librarySearch for libautotrace.a in the system: 'find / -name libautotrace.a 2>/dev/null' or check package contents if installed via package managerAffected if libautotrace.a from version 0.31.1 is found on the system
-
Confirm the vulnerable source file existsCheck if input-pnm.c from the AutoTrace source is present: 'find /path/to/autotrace/source -name input-pnm.c'Affected if The file input-pnm.c containing the pnm_load_ascii function exists in the installed or compiled source
-
Identify PNM file processing activityMonitor or review logs/processes that involve AutoTrace processing PNM/PNM/PNB/PBM/PGM/PPM image files, or check if any automation scripts invoke autotrace on PNM-format inputAffected if AutoTrace is being used to process ASCII-formatted PNM image files (portable anymap format)
-
Check for heap-related crashes or anomaliesReview system logs, crash dumps, or application logs for heap buffer overflow errors occurring when AutoTrace processes image files, particularly mentioning memory corruption in pnm_load_asciiAffected if Heap corruption errors or crashes are logged during PNM file processing, indicating potential exploitation of the overflow
A user is affected if AutoTrace version 0.31.1 is installed and actively processing ASCII-formatted PNM image files using the vulnerable pnm_load_ascii function in input-pnm.c.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a patched version of AutoTrace that addresses the heap overflow in pnm_load_ascii, or implement proper bounds checking in the affected function to validate input sizes against allocated buffer lengths before writing pixel data.
Latest stable AutoTrace release (version 0.32.0 or later)
- 1. Identify all systems running AutoTrace version 0.31.1
- 2. Check the current AutoTrace version on affected systems using: autotrace --version
- 3. Obtain a newer version of AutoTrace from the official project repository or your Linux distribution's package manager
- 4. Upgrade AutoTrace to the latest stable version available
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: autotrace --version
- 6. Test that any workflows relying on AutoTrace still function correctly with the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-9151 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-9151 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data