CVE-2017-9280
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSome NetIQ Identity Manager Applications before Identity Manager 4.5.6.1 included the session token in GET URLs, potentially allowing exposure of user sessions to untrusted third parties via proxies, referer urls or similar.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNetIQ Identity Manager Applications before version 4.5.6.1 transmit session tokens as URL parameters in GET requests instead of using secure transmission methods like HTTP headers or POST bodies. This exposes session credentials through browser history, proxy server logs, and Referer headers to untrusted third parties, potentially allowing session hijacking.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.5.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Identity Manager versionLocate the Identity Manager installation and check the version. This is typically available in the product's about page, release notes, or installation directory metadata. Compare the version number against the affected range (versions prior to 4.5.6.1).Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.5.6.1
-
Verify session token transmission methodLog into the Identity Manager web interface and observe the browser address bar after authentication. Look for session identifiers, tokens, or session IDs appearing as URL parameters (e.g., ?sessionid=xxx or ?token=xxx).Affected if Session tokens appear in the URL after login
-
Inspect network traffic for token exposureUse browser developer tools (Network tab) or a proxy tool to capture HTTP traffic during login and subsequent requests. Examine GET request URLs to determine if session credentials are being transmitted as query parameters.Affected if GET requests contain session identifiers in the URL query string
-
Review stored logs for token leakageExamine proxy server logs, access logs, or browser history where the Identity Manager application has been accessed. Search for patterns where session tokens may have been recorded in URLs.Affected if Historical logs or browser history contains Identity Manager session tokens in URL parameters
You are affected if NetIQ Identity Manager version is below 4.5.6.1 AND session tokens are visible in browser URLs or stored in logs during normal application use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.5.6.1
Upgrade to Identity Manager 4.5.6.1 or later, which implements secure session token handling. Additionally, enforce HTTPS exclusively and review proxy/access logs for any historical exposure of session tokens in URLs.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-9280 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-9280 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data