CVE-2017-9294
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRMI vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager before 8.5.2-01 allows remote attackers to execute internal commands without authentication via RMI ports.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRMI (Remote Method Invocation) vulnerability in Hitachi Device Manager versions prior to 8.5.2-01 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute internal system commands via exposed RMI ports due to missing authentication checks, enabling potential complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Hitachi Device Manager installationLocate the Hitachi Device Manager installation directory. Common paths include /opt/hitachi/device-manager or C:\Program Files\Hitachi\DeviceManager. Check for files named dm.jar, DeviceManager.exe, or similar binary files.Affected if Hitachi Device Manager is installed on the system
-
Determine installed versionCheck the version of Hitachi Device Manager. Look for a version file, use the product's CLI tool if available (such as 'hdvm -version' or similar), or examine the product'sAbout/Version dialog if a GUI is accessible. Compare the version number to the affected range (< 8.5.2-01).Affected if The installed version is 8.5.2 or any version prior to 8.5.2-01
-
Verify RMI service is enabled and accessibleCheck if the RMI service is running. Look for processes related to Device Manager RMI. Verify that RMI ports (default port 1099 and dynamic ports in the 1099-1109 range) are in use by running 'netstat -an' or 'ss -tlnp' and searching for LISTEN connections on these ports.Affected if RMI ports (1099 or adjacent ports) are open and listening, indicating the RMI service is active
-
Assess network exposure of RMI portsScan the network interface for accessibility of RMI ports from untrusted sources. Use 'nmap -p 1099 <target IP>' or similar port scanning tools to determine if port 1099 and nearby ports are reachable from external or untrusted networks. Review firewall rules and network configurations.Affected if RMI ports are accessible from untrusted network segments or the internet
A system is affected if Hitachi Device Manager version 8.5.2 or earlier is installed AND the RMI service is running with accessible network ports.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Hitachi Device Manager to version 8.5.2-01 or later to obtain the patched release. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement network segmentation to restrict access to RMI ports (typically port 1099 and dynamic ports) from untrusted networks, and deploy additional monitoring on these interfaces.
8.5.2-01 or later
- Identify the current installed version of Hitachi Device Manager
- Download Hitachi Device Manager version 8.5.2-01 or later from the official Hitachi support portal
- Review upgrade documentation for your specific environment
- Execute the upgrade following Hitachi's official upgrade procedure
- After upgrade, verify the RMI service is properly secured and accessible only to authorized users
- Confirm the new version is running by checking the Device Manager version information
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-9294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-9294 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data