CrucibleApplication · Atlassian

CVE-2017-9511

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2017-08-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.4.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The MultiPathResource class in Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible, before version 4.4.1 allows anonymous remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a path traversal vulnerability when Fisheye or Crucible is running on the Microsoft Windows operating system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The MultiPathResource class in Atlassian Fisheye and Crucible contains a path traversal vulnerability allowing anonymous remote attackers to read arbitrary files on Windows systems due to insufficient input validation of file paths.

MitigationUpgrade to Fisheye/Crucible version 4.4.1 or later, or implement strict input validation to block path traversal sequences (../) in requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CrucibleApplication
Affected:<= 4.4.0
FisheyeApplication
Affected:<= 4.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Fisheye or Crucible version
    Access the application admin interface and navigate to 'About' or 'System Info', or check the version displayed on the login page. Alternatively, examine the JAR file names in the application installation directory or check the bundled version manifest.
    Affected if The displayed version number is 4.4.0 or any version lower than 4.4.0
  2. Determine the host operating system
    Check the operating system where Fisheye or Crucible is installed by running 'systeminfo' on Windows or 'uname -a' on Unix/Linux, or check the system properties in the Control Panel.
    Affected if The application is running on a Windows-based host (the vulnerability specifically affects Windows systems)
  3. Verify web interface accessibility
    Attempt to access the Fisheye/Crucible web URL from a browser or using a tool like curl: curl -I http://<hostname>:<port>/ - where <port> is typically 8060 for Crucible or 8080 for Fisheye.
    Affected if The web interface responds to requests, indicating the vulnerable component is network-accessible
  4. Check for anonymous access configuration
    Review the application configuration files (typically in the FISHEYE_INST/config.xml or similar) to determine if anonymous/unauthenticated access is permitted, or attempt to access restricted endpoints without credentials.
    Affected if Anonymous access is enabled, as the vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to exploit the path traversal
  5. Confirm MultiPathResource endpoint exposure
    Attempt a benign path traversal test against the application by making a request with '../' sequences to a suspected endpoint, or review server logs for suspicious path traversal patterns in access logs.
    Affected if Requests containing '../' sequences are processed without being blocked or sanitized, indicating the vulnerability is present

If Fisheye or Crucible version 4.4.0 or earlier is running on Windows with the web interface accessible to anonymous users, the environment is affected by this path traversal vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.4.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Fisheye/Crucible version 4.4.1 or later, or implement strict input validation to block path traversal sequences (../) in requests.

Fix this in Crucible Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-9511 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-9511 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data