CVE-2017-9528
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIrfanView version 4.44 (32bit) with FPX Plugin 4.46 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted .fpx file, related to a "User Mode Write AV starting at FPX!FPX_GetScanDevicePropertyGroup+0x0000000000000f53."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in IrfanView 4.44 (32-bit) with FPX Plugin 4.46 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service via a crafted .fpx file. The vulnerability manifests as a User Mode Write Access Violation in the FPX_GetScanDevicePropertyGroup function.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.44= 4.46CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check IrfanView versionOpen IrfanView, go to Help > About, or right-click irfanview.exe and select Properties > Details to view the File VersionAffected if The version is exactly 4.44 (32-bit)
-
Check FPX plugin versionIn IrfanView, go to Help > Plugins / Plugin info to see installed plugin versions, or inspect the fpx.dll file in the IrfanView plugins folder and check its versionAffected if The FPX plugin version is exactly 4.46
-
Verify FPX plugin is loadedOpen IrfanView and try to open a .fpx file, or check if fpx.dll exists in the plugins directory (typically C:\Program Files\IrfanView\Plugins\)Affected if The FPX plugin (fpx.dll) is present and IrfanView can load .fpx files
-
Confirm 32-bit installationIn IrfanView, go to Help > About or check the program directory name - 32-bit versions are typically installed in 'C:\Program Files (x86)\IrfanView\'Affected if The installed IrfanView is the 32-bit version
You are affected only if you have IrfanView 4.44 (32-bit) specifically with FPX plugin version 4.46, and the FPX plugin is installed and able to process .fpx files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate IrfanView and the FPX plugin to their latest versions; avoid opening untrusted .fpx files; consider removing the FPX plugin if not required.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-9528 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-9528 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data