Middleton Community Bank MobileApplication · Mononabank

CVE-2017-9576

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-06-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The "Middleton Community Bank Mobile Banking" by Middleton Community Bank app 3.0.0 -- aka middleton-community-bank-mobile-banking/id721843238 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Middleton Community Bank Mobile Banking iOS app version 3.0.0 fails to validate X.509 certificates from SSL servers, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept encrypted communications by presenting a crafted certificate. This enables credential theft and session hijacking.

MitigationImplement proper SSL/TLS certificate validation using certificate pinning or standard X.509 chain verification within the iOS application's network layer.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Middleton Community Bank MobileApplication
Affected:= 3.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed app version
    On iOS device: Go to Settings > General > iPhone Storage (or iPad Storage), find Middleton Community Bank Mobile Banking, and note the version number displayed. Alternatively, open App Store, tap your profile icon, tap Purchased, find the app, and check the version.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.0.0
  2. Test SSL certificate validation with untrusted certificate
    Configure a network proxy tool (such as Burp Suite, Charles Proxy, or OWASP ZAP) on a separate machine. Install the proxy's CA certificate as trusted on the iOS device. Route the device's traffic through the proxy. Attempt to intercept traffic destined for the bank's servers.
    Affected if The app successfully establishes connections and transmits data even when an invalid or self-signed certificate is presented by the proxy, indicating no certificate validation occurs
  3. Inspect network layer for certificate validation code
    If the app binary or source code is available, examine the network implementation. Search for NSURLSession, NSURLConnection, or third-party networking libraries. Look for whether NSURLSessionConfiguration's URLCredential methods or certificate pinning delegates are implemented. Check if SecTrustEvaluate or similar certificate chain validation functions are called.
    Affected if The network code lacks certificate pinning implementation and contains no calls to validate X.509 certificate chains before accepting connections

You are affected if the installed version is exactly 3.0.0 AND the app accepts connections with invalid certificates during MITM proxy testing, demonstrating that certificate validation is not enforced.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper SSL/TLS certificate validation using certificate pinning or standard X.509 chain verification within the iOS application's network layer.

Fix this in Middleton Community Bank Mobile Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-9576 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-9576 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data