dbcve.org
JunosOperating system · Juniper

CVE-2018-0061

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-10-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A denial of service vulnerability in the telnetd service on Junos OS allows remote unauthenticated users to cause high CPU usage which may affect system performance. Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 12.1X46 versions prior to 12.1X46-D81 on SRX Series; 12.3 versions prior to 12.3R12-S11; 12.3X48 versions prior to 12.3X48-D80 on SRX Series; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D150, 15.1X49-D160 on SRX Series; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D59 on EX2300/EX3400 Series; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D68 on QFX10K Series; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D235 on QFX5200/QFX5110 Series; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D495 on NFX Series; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R4-S12, 16.1R6-S6, 16.1R7; 16.2 versions prior to 16.2R2-S7, 16.2R3; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2-S9, 17.1R3; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R2-S6, 17.2R3; 17.2X75 versions prior to 17.2X75-D100; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R2-S4, 17.3R3; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R1-S5, 17.4R2; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D5.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A denial of service vulnerability exists in the telnetd service on Junos OS where remote unauthenticated attackers can send specially crafted packets causing high CPU usage and degraded system performance. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of telnet connections leading to resource exhaustion.

MitigationUpgrade Junos OS to the specified fixed versions (e.g., 12.1X46-D81, 15.1R7, 17.4R2) or disable the telnetd service if not required, as telnet is an inherently insecure protocol.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JunosOperating system
Affected:= 12.1x46= 12.3= 12.3x48= 15.1= 15.1x49= 15.1x53= 16.1= 16.2= 17.1= 17.2= 17.2x75= 17.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if telnetd service is enabled
    Run 'show system services' or 'show configuration system services' to view enabled services
    Affected if telnet is listed among enabled services
  2. Identify the Junos OS version
    Run 'show version' or 'show version detail' to display the installed Junos OS version
    Affected if the displayed version matches any of these: 12.1x46, 12.3, 12.3x48, 15.1, 15.1x49, 15.1x53, 16.1, 16.2, 17.1, 17.2, 17.2x75, or 17.3
  3. Verify telnet daemon is running
    Run 'show system processes | match telnet' or check 'ps aux | grep telnet' to see if telnetd process is active
    Affected if a telnetd process is actively running on the system
  4. Check for abnormal CPU usage linked to telnet
    Run 'show system processes extensive' and look for high CPU utilization by telnet-related processes
    Affected if telnet processes are consuming unusually high CPU resources, indicating potential exploitation

A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Junos OS version listed above AND has telnetd service enabled and running.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Junos OS to the specified fixed versions (e.g., 12.1X46-D81, 15.1R7, 17.4R2) or disable the telnetd service if not required, as telnet is an inherently insecure protocol.

Fix this in Junos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0061 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data