CVE-2018-0096
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the role-based access control (RBAC) functionality of Cisco Prime Infrastructure could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a privilege escalation in which one virtual domain user can view and modify another virtual domain configuration. The vulnerability is due to a failure to properly enforce RBAC for virtual domains. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending an authenticated, crafted HTTP request to a targeted application. An exploit could allow the attacker to bypass RBAC policies on the targeted system to modify a virtual domain and access resources that are not normally accessible. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg36875.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an RBAC bypass vulnerability in Cisco Prime Infrastructure where virtual domain isolation is not properly enforced. An authenticated attacker with a crafted HTTP request can bypass RBAC policies to view and modify configurations in other virtual domains, achieving privilege escalation across domain boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.2\(0.0\)= 3.3\(0.0\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Prime Infrastructure versionLog into the Cisco Prime Infrastructure web interface and navigate to Administration > Settings > System Settings > Software Update, or run 'show version' via CLI to confirm the installed version is 3.2(0.0) or 3.3(0.0)Affected if The installed version matches 3.2(0.0) or 3.3(0.0)
-
Verify virtual domains feature is configuredIn the Cisco Prime Infrastructure web interface, go to Administration > Users, Roles, and Virtual Domains > Virtual Domains to check if more than one virtual domain existsAffected if Multiple virtual domains are configured and active
-
Review RBAC policy configurationNavigate to Administration > Users, Roles, and Virtual Domains > Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and verify that domain-specific policies are defined to isolate configurations between virtual domainsAffected if RBAC policies exist but may not be properly enforcing domain isolation boundaries
-
Check authentication logs for cross-domain access attemptsIn Cisco Prime Infrastructure, go to Reports > Audit Logs or view system logs via CLI (show logs) for entries containing virtual domain ID changes or access to resources outside the assigned domainAffected if Audit logs show authenticated users accessing configurations or resources belonging to other virtual domains
-
Test domain boundary enforcementAs a user assigned to one virtual domain, attempt to access configuration data or device groups belonging to a different virtual domain using direct URL navigation or API requestsAffected if A user can view or modify resources in another virtual domain despite being assigned to a different domain
You are affected if Cisco Prime Infrastructure version 3.2(0.0) or 3.3(0.0) is running with multiple virtual domains configured, and users can access resources outside their assigned domain boundaries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch for CSCvg36875 to enforce proper RBAC isolation between virtual domains, and verify that cross-domain access is no longer possible after patching.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0096 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0096 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data