Unified Communications ManagerApplication · Cisco

CVE-2018-0105

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2018-01-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data. The vulnerability is due to insufficient protection of database tables. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by browsing to a specific URL. An exploit could allow the attacker to view data library information. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf20269.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco Unified Communications Manager allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data by browsing to a specific URL. The issue stems from insufficient protection of database tables, enabling exposure of data library information.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for CSCvf20269 to the Unified Communications Manager. If a patch is unavailable, consider restricting web framework access via network segmentation or firewall rules to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Communications ManagerApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Cisco Unified Communications Manager version
    Log into the CUCM Administrative UI and navigate to About > Product Information, or use the CLI command 'show version' to retrieve the installed version number
    Affected if The system is running any version of Cisco Unified Communications Manager without patch CSCvf20269 applied
  2. Verify patch CSCvf20269 is installed
    Using the CUCM CLI, run 'show patch' or access the Cisco Unified OS Administration interface to view installed patches; locate entry for patch ID CSCvf20269 in the patch list
    Affected if Patch CSCvf20269 is not listed among installed patches
  3. Confirm web framework is accessible
    Attempt to access the CUCM web interface from an untrusted network or verify firewall rules allow external access to ports 443/8443 used by the CUCM web framework
    Affected if The CUCM web interface (HTTPS on port 443 or 8443) is accessible from untrusted networks without proper network segmentation
  4. Review web server access logs for suspicious URLs
    Examine CUCM web logs (typically located in /var/log/httpd/ or accessible via RTMT) for repeated requests to unusual database table URLs or paths that may indicate exploitation attempts
    Affected if Logs show unauthorized access attempts to sensitive database table URLs or unexpected data exposure requests

The environment is affected if Cisco Unified Communications Manager is running without patch CSCvf20269 and the web framework is network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for CSCvf20269 to the Unified Communications Manager. If a patch is unavailable, consider restricting web framework access via network segmentation or firewall rules to limit exposure.

Fix this in Unified Communications Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0105 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0105 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data