CVE-2018-0110
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to access the remote support account even after it has been disabled via the web application. The vulnerability is due to a design flaw in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server, which would not disable access to specifically configured user accounts, even after access had been disabled in the web application. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the remote support account, even after it had been disabled at the web application level. An exploit could allow the attacker to modify server configuration and gain access to customer data. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg46741.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA design flaw in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server allows authenticated remote attackers to access remote support accounts even after those accounts have been disabled through the web application interface. The web application-level disabling does not actually revoke authentication access at the system level, allowing continued access to modify server configurations and exfiltrate customer data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco WebEx Meetings Server installationIdentify the product running in your environment by checking the server banner, installed packages, or administrative interface. Look for 'Cisco WebEx Meetings Server' or 'CWMS' in system information.Affected if The system is confirmed to be Cisco WebEx Meetings Server of any version.
-
Locate remote support accountsAccess the administrative web interface and navigate to the user or account management section. Look for accounts with roles such as 'Remote Support', 'Support', or administrative accounts used for vendor support purposes.Affected if Remote support accounts exist in the system, regardless of their enabled/disabled status.
-
Verify disabled account status via web interfaceIn the web-based administrative console, check which remote support accounts show as 'disabled', 'inactive', or have been toggled off through the account management UI.Affected if Any remote support accounts have been disabled through the web application interface.
-
Test authentication access for disabled accountsAttempt to authenticate using the supposedly disabled remote support account credentials against the system's authentication endpoints (e.g., login page, API, or SSO). Compare authentication behavior against a known-good disabled account.Affected if The disabled remote support account can still successfully authenticate and gain access to the system.
-
Review account access logs for disabled accountsExamine authentication logs, audit logs, or access logs for the Cisco WebEx Meetings Server. Look for successful logins, configuration changes, or data access events originating from accounts listed as disabled in the web interface.Affected if Any log entries show successful authentication or system access by accounts that are disabled in the web interface.
If remote support accounts disabled via the web interface can still authenticate or have logged activity after being disabled, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco's vendor patch for CSCvg46741 to ensure web application-level account disabling properly revokes authentication access. Until patched, implement additional access controls and monitoring on remote support accounts.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0110 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0110 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data