CVE-2018-0118
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the web-based management interface to click a link that is designed to submit malicious input to the interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or allow the attacker to access sensitive browser-based information on the targeted device. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg51264.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco Unified Communications Manager web-based management interface contains a stored XSS vulnerability due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this by tricking a user into clicking a malicious link that submits crafted input to the interface, allowing arbitrary JavaScript execution in the user's browser context or access to sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CUCM web management interface exposureDetermine if the Cisco Unified Communications Manager web interface is accessible on your network. This is typically accessible via HTTPS on port 8443 or 443. Check your firewall rules and network scans for devices responding on these ports with a Cisco Unified Communications Manager login page.Affected if The CUCM web interface is accessible from a network where untrusted users could potentially send malicious links to management users.
-
Confirm the installed CUCM versionLog into the Cisco Unified Communications Manager administration interface and navigate to About > Version Information, or run the 'show version' command via the CUCM CLI to identify the exact version installed.Affected if Any version of Cisco Unified Communications Manager is listed, as all versions are affected by this vulnerability.
-
Review web interface logs for XSS indicatorsExamine CUCM web logs (such as Tomcat access logs or Cisco Tomcat logs) for suspicious JavaScript payload patterns, such as <script> tags, javascript: URIs, or event handler attributes like onerror, onload within request parameters.Affected if Any entries containing XSS payload patterns are found in the web interface logs, indicating potential exploitation attempts.
-
Check for CSCvg51264 patch installationIn the CUCM administration interface, navigate to Cisco Unified Reporting > System Reports > Software Upgrades > Install History, or use the CLI command 'show version active' to identify installed patches. Look for patch ID CSCvg51264 in the installed patches list.Affected if The patch CSCvg51264 is NOT listed among installed patches, meaning the vulnerability remains unmitigated.
Your environment is affected if Cisco Unified Communications Manager web interface is accessible and the CSCvg51264 patch has not been installed, regardless of the specific CUCM version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch for CSCvg51264. Until patched, users should avoid clicking untrusted links to the management interface. Consider deploying a web application firewall (WAF) as an interim control.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0118 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0118 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data