Unity ConnectionApplication · Cisco

CVE-2018-0203

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-02-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the SMTP relay of Cisco Unity Connection could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to send unsolicited email messages, aka a Mail Relay Vulnerability. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of domain information in the affected software. An unauthenticated, remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to the targeted application. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to send email messages to arbitrary addresses. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg62215.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The SMTP relay in Cisco Unity Connection has improper handling of domain information, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to send crafted requests that exploit the relay to deliver email to arbitrary addresses. This is an open relay vulnerability that enables spam or phishing emails to be sent through the compromised system.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for CSCvg62215, or if no patch is available, restrict SMTP relay to authorized IPs/domains and enable required authentication to prevent unauthenticated relay.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unity ConnectionApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify SMTP relay service status
    Access Cisco Unity Connection administration interface and navigate to SMTP Relay configuration (System > SMTP). Check if the SMTP relay service is enabled and running.
    Affected if SMTP relay is enabled and accessible to unauthenticated users
  2. Check relay access controls
    In the SMTP relay configuration, inspect the 'Allow relay from' or 'Trusted hosts' settings. Determine if the relay accepts connections from any host (0.0.0.0/0 or unrestricted) or is limited to specific IP ranges.
    Affected if Relay accepts connections from any IP address or unauthenticated sources
  3. Verify authentication requirements
    In SMTP relay settings, check if 'Require authentication' is enabled. Look for options controlling anonymous relay access.
    Affected if Authentication is not required for SMTP relay (anonymous relay allowed)
  4. Confirm relay destination restrictions
    Examine if there are restrictions on destination email domains the relay will accept. Check if relay will forward to any destination address or only to internal/authorized domains.
    Affected if Relay forwards emails to arbitrary external domains without restriction

If the SMTP relay on Cisco Unity Connection is accessible without authentication and accepts connections from any source to forward to arbitrary destinations, the system is vulnerable to CVE-2018-0203.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for CSCvg62215, or if no patch is available, restrict SMTP relay to authorized IPs/domains and enable required authentication to prevent unauthenticated relay.

Fix this in Unity Connection Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0203 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data