CVE-2018-0258
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco Prime File Upload servlet affecting multiple Cisco products could allow a remote attacker to upload arbitrary files to any directory of a vulnerable device (aka Path Traversal) and execute those files. This vulnerability affects the following products: Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) Version 10.0 and later, and Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI) All versions. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf32411, CSCvf81727.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the Cisco Prime File Upload servlet, allowing remote attackers to perform path traversal attacks and upload arbitrary files to any directory on the affected device, then execute those files. This affects Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) versions 10.0+ and all versions of Cisco Prime Infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0\(1\)= 10.2\(1\)= 3.3\(0.0\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco Prime productDetermine if Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) or Cisco Prime Infrastructure is deployed in the environment. Check for running processes or installed applications matching these product names.Affected if Either Cisco Prime DCNM or Cisco Prime Infrastructure is installed
-
Check Cisco Prime DCNM versionLocate the installed version of Cisco Prime DCNM. Consult the application's about page, installation directory, or version registry entry. Compare the version to the affected releases 10.0(1) and 10.2(1).Affected if The installed version is 10.0(1) or 10.2(1)
-
Check Cisco Prime Infrastructure versionLocate the installed version of Cisco Prime Infrastructure. Consult the application's about page, installation directory, or version registry entry. Compare the version to the affected release 3.3(0.0).Affected if The installed version is 3.3(0.0)
-
Verify file upload servlet exposureIdentify if the Cisco Prime File Upload servlet (typically accessible via web interface) is exposed to network access. Check firewall rules and access control lists for inbound access to the application's upload endpoints.Affected if The file upload servlet is accessible from untrusted network segments or the internet
A user is affected if they have Cisco Prime DCNM versions 10.0(1) or 10.2(1), or Cisco Prime Infrastructure version 3.3(0.0), with the file upload servlet exposed to network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided patches for CSCvf32411 and CSCvf81727, or if patches are unavailable, restrict network access to the file upload servlet and consider disabling the affected service until remediation is possible.
DCNM 10.3(1) or later; PI 3.4 or later (or apply respective security patches)
- 1. Identify the exact Cisco Prime product and version running using 'show version' or the web interface
- 2. For Cisco Prime Data Center Network Manager (DCNM): Upgrade to DCNM version 10.3(1) or later which contains the fix for CSCvf32411
- 3. For Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI): Apply the applicable security patch for CSCvf81727 or upgrade to PI version 3.4 or later
- 4. After upgrade, verify the File Upload servlet is no longer accessible without authentication
- 5. Review Cisco PSIRT advisory for this CVE for complete patch documentation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0258 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0258 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data