CVE-2018-0268
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the container management subsystem of Cisco Digital Network Architecture (DNA) Center could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and gain elevated privileges. This vulnerability is due to an insecure default configuration of the Kubernetes container management subsystem within DNA Center. An attacker who has the ability to access the Kubernetes service port could execute commands with elevated privileges within provisioned containers. A successful exploit could result in a complete compromise of affected containers. This vulnerability affects Cisco DNA Center Software Releases 1.1.3 and prior. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi47253.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco DNA Center's container management subsystem allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain elevated privileges. The issue stems from an insecure default configuration of the Kubernetes container management subsystem, where attackers who can access the Kubernetes service port can execute commands with elevated privileges within provisioned containers, resulting in complete compromise of affected containers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco DNA Center versionAccess the Cisco DNA Center administrative interface or use the CLI command 'show version' to determine the currently installed software version.Affected if The installed version is 1.1.3 or earlier.
-
Locate the Kubernetes service portReview network documentation or scan internal ranges to identify any service listening on ports typically used for Kubernetes (such as 6443, 10250, 10255).Affected if The Kubernetes API server or kubelet port is discovered on the network and is reachable from an untrusted segment.
-
Verify container management accessibilityFrom a system outside the expected management network, attempt to reach the identified Kubernetes service port to confirm external accessibility.Affected if The Kubernetes service port responds to connections from networks outside the trusted administrative zone.
-
Confirm container subsystem configurationIf access is available, examine the container management subsystem configuration for default or insecure settings that allow unauthenticated command execution.Affected if The Kubernetes subsystem permits unauthenticated or elevated privileged operations from the service port.
A Cisco DNA Center installation is affected if it runs version 1.1.3 or earlier and has its Kubernetes service port accessible from networks that are not strictly trusted.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a Cisco DNA Center software release newer than 1.1.3. Additionally, restrict network access to the Kubernetes service port to prevent unauthorized external attackers from reaching it.
Cisco DNA Center 1.1.4 or later (first fixed release is 1.1.4)
- 1. Back up the current Cisco DNA Center configuration and ensure you have a valid disaster recovery plan in place.
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade may require downtime.
- 3. Download the Cisco DNA Center software version 1.1.4 or later from the Cisco Software Download center.
- 4. Access the Cisco DNA Center admin interface and navigate to the Software Updates section.
- 5. Upload the new software image and initiate the upgrade process.
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming all services are running and the new version is displayed in the UI.
- 7. Validate that the Kubernetes container management subsystem is properly configured with secure settings.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0268 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0268 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data