CVE-2018-0342
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the configuration and monitoring service of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incomplete bounds checks for data that is provided by the configuration and monitoring service of the affected solution. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious data to the vDaemon listening service on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a buffer overflow condition on the affected device, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the device or cause the vDaemon listening service to reload and result in a DoS condition on the device. This vulnerability affects the following Cisco products if they are running a release of the Cisco SD-WAN Solution prior to Release 18.3.0: vBond Orchestrator Software, vEdge 100 Series Routers, vEdge 1000 Series Routers, vEdge 2000 Series Routers, vEdge 5000 Series Routers, vEdge Cloud Router Platform, vManage Network Management Software, vSmart Controller Software. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi70003.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the vDaemon configuration and monitoring service of Cisco SD-WAN Solution due to incomplete bounds checking on user-supplied data. An authenticated local attacker can send malicious data to the vDaemon listening service, causing overflow conditions that allow arbitrary code execution with root privileges or denial of service via service reload.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versions< 18.3.0< 18.3.0< 18.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco SD-WAN product typeDetermine which Cisco SD-WAN component is deployed: Vbond Orchestrator, Vedge Plus, Vedge Pro, Vmanage, Vsmart Controller, or Vedge 100 series hardware. Check system documentation or inventory for the product model.Affected if The product is any of: Vbond Orchestrator, Vedge Plus, Vedge Pro, Vmanage Network Management, Vsmart Controller, or Vedge 100/100b/100m hardware.
-
Check the installed firmware or software versionFor Vedge 100 series hardware, run 'show version' or access the device management interface to view the firmware version. For software-based components (Vbond, Vmanage, Vsmart), check the installed software version via CLI or management interface.Affected if For Vedge 100/100b/100m: firmware version is earlier than 18.3.0. For Vbond, Vedge Plus, Vedge Pro, Vmanage, or Vsmart: all versions are affected.
-
Verify vDaemon service statusCheck if the vDaemon service is running on the affected device. On Cisco SD-WAN devices, this may be visible in process listings or service status outputs. Use commands like 'show process' or check service logs if accessible.Affected if The vDaemon service is running and accessible for local authenticated connections.
-
Confirm local authenticated access scopeReview local user accounts and access controls on the SD-WAN device. Check which users have shell or administrative access to the device.Affected if More than trusted personnel have local authenticated access to the device, allowing potential attack execution.
If the system is any Cisco SD-WAN product (Vbond, Vedge Plus/Pro, Vmanage, Vsmart, or Vedge 100 series) and vDaemon is running with broader-than-intended local access, the environment may be affected; Vedge 100 series devices are affected if firmware is below 18.3.0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data18.3.0
Upgrade to Cisco SD-WAN Release 18.3.0 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. Prior to upgrade, restrict local authenticated access to trusted personnel only.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0342 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0342 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data