CVE-2018-0377
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Open Systems Gateway initiative (OSGi) interface of Cisco Policy Suite before 18.1.0 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to directly connect to the OSGi interface. The vulnerability is due to a lack of authentication. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by directly connecting to the OSGi interface. An exploit could allow the attacker to access or change any files that are accessible by the OSGi process. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvh18017.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA critical authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the OSGi (Open Systems Gateway initiative) interface of Cisco Policy Suite versions prior to 18.1.0. The interface lacks any authentication mechanism, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to directly connect and access or modify any files accessible to the OSGi process. This gives attackers equivalent file system access to the OSGi service account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.0.0< 18.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Policy Suite installationSearch for Cisco Policy Suite processes or installation directories - check /opt/cps/ or look for running 'cps' processes using ps aux | grep cpsAffected if Cisco Policy Suite software is present on the system
-
Determine installed Cisco Policy Suite versionRun version detection command: rpm -qa | grep cps or check /opt/cps/version if the directory existsAffected if Installed version is below 18.1.0
-
Identify Cisco Mobility Services Engine installationCheck for Cisco Mobility Services Engine processes or installation at /opt/mse/ or look for 'mse' processesAffected if Cisco Mobility Services Engine version 14.0.0 is running
-
Detect OSGi interface port exposureCheck for open OSGi ports (commonly 8081) using netstat -an | grep 8081 or ss -tlnp | grep 8081Affected if OSGi port is listening and exposed to network
-
Verify OSGi interface lacks authenticationAttempt unauthenticated HTTP request to OSGi endpoint, e.g., curl http://localhost:8081/ or curl http://target:8081/ - if response returns without requiring login credentialsAffected if OSGi interface accepts requests without any authentication
System is affected if either Cisco Policy Suite below version 18.1.0 or Cisco Mobility Services Engine version 14.0.0 is running and the OSGi interface is accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped18.1.0
Upgrade to Cisco Policy Suite version 18.1.0 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement network-level access controls to restrict or block unauthorized access to the OSGi interface port.
Cisco Policy Suite 18.1.0 or later (Mobility Services Engine: contact Cisco for specific fixed version)
- Identify the current version of Cisco Policy Suite running in the environment
- If the current version is before 18.1.0, plan for an upgrade to version 18.1.0 or later
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- Back up current configuration data before performing the upgrade
- Upgrade Cisco Policy Suite to version 18.1.0 or the latest stable release
- After upgrade, verify the OSGi interface now requires authentication
- Confirm that the system is functioning correctly post-upgrade
- For Mobility Services Engine version 14.0.0, contact Cisco support to confirm if a separate patch or update is required
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0377 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0377 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data