CVE-2018-0411
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface of the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or allow the attacker to access sensitive browser-based information. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvk15343.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this by tricking a user into clicking a crafted link, allowing execution of arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access to sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.5\(2.10000.5\)= 11.0\(1.10000.10\)= 11.5\(1.10000.6\)= 12.0\(1.10000.10\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco Unified Communications Manager is installedLocate the Cisco Unified Communications Manager installation by checking for the product on the system, typically found in /opt/cisco or C:\Program Files\Cisco, or query the system for installed software named 'Cisco Unified Communications Manager' or 'CUCM'.Affected if The product is not installed on the system.
-
Identify the installed CUCM versionAccess the web-based management interface and navigate to the About page, or run the command 'show version' via the CLI (SSH to the CUCM IP and authenticate). The version will display in format like 10.5(2), 11.0(1), 11.5(1), or 12.0(1).Affected if The version exactly matches 10.5(2.10000.5), 11.0(1.10000.10), 11.5(1.10000.6), or 12.0(1.10000.10).
-
Verify the web-based management interface is enabledConfirm the Cisco Unified Communications Manager web interface is accessible by attempting to reach https://<CUCM-IP>/ccmadmin/ or the main login page. Check via CLI using 'show network eth0' to confirm HTTP/HTTPS services are running.Affected if The web management interface is exposed and accessible to network users.
-
Check for indicators of exploitation attemptsReview web server access logs (typically located in /var/log/httpd/ or /opt/cisco/cmplatform/log/) for suspicious URL patterns containing script tags, javascript:, or unusual parameters in requests to the management interface.Affected if Logs contain requests with XSS payload patterns targeting the management interface.
A system is affected only if Cisco Unified Communications Manager is installed with an exact version match to 10.5(2.10000.5), 11.0(1.10000.10), 11.5(1.10000.6), or 12.0(1.10000.10) AND the web-based management interface is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch from Cisco (refer to CSCvk15343) when available. Users should avoid clicking untrusted links to the management interface until the fix is applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0411 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0411 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data