CVE-2018-0419
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in certain attachment detection mechanisms of Cisco Email Security Appliances (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the filtering functionality of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to the improper detection of content within executable (EXE) files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a customized EXE file that is not recognized and blocked by the ESA. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to send email messages that contain malicious executable files to unsuspecting users. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvh03786.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance's attachment detection mechanisms allows malicious executable (EXE) files to bypass content filtering. The ESA fails to properly detect and block certain EXE file content, enabling an unauthenticated remote attacker to deliver malicious attachments to end users via email.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco ESA is deployedIdentify if Cisco Email Security Appliance is in use in your environment. Check product model, GUI login page, or network documentation for 'Cisco Email Security Appliance' or 'ESA' branding.Affected if The product is confirmed as Cisco Email Security Appliance and all versions are vulnerable.
-
Verify attachment scanning is enabledAccess the ESA web interface or CLI. Navigate to Incoming Mail Policies > Attachment Filtering, or use the command: 'filters show' or check the 'attachment' settings in the mail policy configuration.Affected if Attachment scanning is enabled and the CVE allows EXE files to bypass this protection.
-
Check EXE file type is included in blocked extensionsIn ESA GUI, go to Mail Policies > Incoming Mail Policy > Attachment Filtering tab. Verify if '.exe' extension is listed in the 'Blocked File Types' or check via CLI with: 'filters list' or 'attachmentconfig'.Affected if EXE files are not explicitly blocked or the file extension filtering is not configured.
-
Test outbound mail for EXE attachment detectionSend a test email with a .exe file attachment through the ESA to a test account and verify if the attachment is detected, blocked, or quarantined. Monitor the message tracking logs in ESA.Affected if The EXE attachment is delivered without being detected, blocked, or quarantined by the ESA content filters.
-
Review message tracking for delivered EXE attachmentsIn ESA, use Message Tracking or Centralized Logging to search for recently delivered emails with .exe attachments. Look for any entries where 'EXE' or 'executable' appears in attachment metadata.Affected if Emails with EXE attachments were delivered to end users without being flagged or blocked.
If Cisco ESA is deployed with attachment filtering enabled but EXE files are still being delivered to end users without detection, the environment is likely affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco security patch for CSCvh03786 when available. As an interim workaround, consider implementing additional email filtering layers or restricting EXE attachments at the gateway until the patch can be deployed.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0419 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0419 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data