ExplzhApplication · Ponsoftware

CVE-2018-0646

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-09-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.58 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Directory traversal vulnerability in Explzh v.7.58 and earlier allows an attacker to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Explzh versions 7.58 and earlier contain a directory traversal vulnerability that allows authenticated or unauthenticated attackers to escape the intended directory boundaries and read arbitrary files on the host system via unspecified vectors. This is a path traversal issue likely exploitable through archive extraction functionality, enabling unauthorized file system access with information disclosure impact.

MitigationUpgrade to Explzh version 7.59 or later to obtain the vendor patch. Additionally, restrict file access permissions and monitor for unusual file access patterns from systems running the affected software.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ExplzhApplication
Affected:<= 7.58

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Explzh version
    Open Explzh and access the Help > About menu, or right-click the executable file and view its Properties to see the version number. Alternatively, locate the Explzh executable (explzh.exe) in the program directory and check its file properties.
    Affected if The version displayed is 7.58 or any version lower than 7.59
  2. Confirm the product is Ponsoftware Explzh
    Verify that the archive utility software is specifically Ponsoftware Explzh and not another archive tool, as this CVE applies only to Explzh.
    Affected if The software is Ponsoftware Explzh and the version is 7.58 or earlier
  3. Check for the vulnerable archive extraction feature
    The vulnerability is exploitable through archive extraction functionality. Identify whether users have the ability to extract or open archive files (ZIP, 7z, CAB, ARJ, RAR, etc.) using Explzh.
    Affected if The archive extraction feature is available and users can open or extract archive files
  4. Review for signs of unauthorized file access
    Check system logs, application logs, and file system audit logs for any unusual read operations on files outside the intended extraction directory. Look for access patterns where files were read from system directories (Windows, System32, Program Files) or user-specified paths that differ from the extraction destination.
    Affected if Logs show file read operations from arbitrary system locations that were not intentionally accessed by the user

A user is affected if they are running Explzh version 7.58 or earlier and the archive extraction feature is in use, since the path traversal flaw allows escaping the intended directory during extraction.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.58
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Explzh version 7.59 or later to obtain the vendor patch. Additionally, restrict file access permissions and monitor for unusual file access patterns from systems running the affected software.

Fix this in Explzh Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $910
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0646 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0646 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data