CVE-2018-0662
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple I-O DATA network camera products (TS-WRLP firmware Ver.1.09.04 and earlier, TS-WRLA firmware Ver.1.09.04 and earlier, TS-WRLP/E firmware Ver.1.09.04 and earlier) allow an attacker on the same network segment to add malicious files on the device and execute arbitrary code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple I-O DATA network camera models (TS-WRLP, TS-WRLA, TS-WRLP/E) with firmware Ver.1.09.04 and earlier contain a vulnerability that allows an attacker on the same network segment to upload malicious files to the device and execute arbitrary code, likely due to improper file upload validation or authentication bypass.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.09.04<= 1.09.04<= 1.09.04CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the camera modelAccess the device web interface or check the device label to confirm the exact model number is TS-WRLP, TS-WRLA, or TS-WRLP/EAffected if model is not one of TS-WRLP, TS-WRLA, or TS-WRLP/E - not affected
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the camera web admin panel and navigate to the System or Status page to view the firmware version informationAffected if firmware version is 1.09.04 or earlier (any version <=1.09.04)
-
Verify the web administration interface is accessibleAttempt to access the camera IP address on ports 80 or 443 to confirm the HTTP service is running and the upload functionality is availableAffected if web interface is not accessible - vulnerability may not be exploitable but device is still vulnerable at firmware level
-
Confirm network exposureDetermine if the camera is on a network segment accessible to untrusted users or systemsAffected if device is on an isolated network - risk is lower but the vulnerability still exists in the firmware
Device is affected if it is a TS-WRLP, TS-WRLA, or TS-WRLP/E model running firmware version 1.09.04 or earlier, regardless of network isolation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate firmware to a version newer than 1.09.04. Additionally, isolate camera devices on a separate VLAN or network segment to limit attack surface to trusted network peers.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0662 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0662 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data