CVE-2018-1000407
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site scripting vulnerability exists in Jenkins 2.145 and earlier, LTS 2.138.1 and earlier in core/src/main/java/hudson/model/Api.java that allows attackers to specify URLs to Jenkins that result in rendering arbitrary attacker-controlled HTML by Jenkins.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn XSS vulnerability in Jenkins core Api.java allows attackers to inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript through specially crafted URLs. The vulnerability affects the URL rendering in the API, enabling stored XSS attacks against users who access attacker-controlled URLs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.138.1<= 2.145CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Jenkins versionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > About Jenkins or access /whoAmI/api/json endpoint. Alternatively, check the jenkins.war file metadata or the Jenkins startup logs.Affected if Version is 2.138.1 or lower, or 2.145 or lower (any version in the 2.x series at or below these thresholds)
-
Identify if running LTS or weekly releaseLook at the version number format. LTS versions follow pattern like 2.x.x (e.g., 2.138.1). Weekly releases are milestone versions like 2.145.Affected if LTS releases at 2.138.1 or below, or weekly releases at 2.145 or below, are vulnerable
-
Verify API endpoint is accessibleAccess the Jenkins API at /api/ on your Jenkins instance (e.g., http://yourjenkins/api/). The vulnerability exists in the URL rendering of this endpoint.Affected if The API endpoint is accessible to users (this is the default state for most Jenkins installations)
If your Jenkins version is 2.138.1 or lower (LTS) or 2.145 or lower (weekly), and the API is accessible, your environment is vulnerable to CVE-2018-1000407.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Jenkins to version 2.145+ or LTS 2.138.2+ to patch the vulnerable code in Api.java. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement URL parameter validation and deploy a WAF as a compensating control.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1000407 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1000407 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data