CVE-2018-1000630
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBattelle V2I Hub 2.5.1 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote authenticated attacker could send specially-crafted SQL statements to /api/PluginStatusActions.php and /status/pluginStatus.php using the jtSorting or id parameter, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Battelle V2I Hub 2.5.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL queries via the jtSorting and id parameters at /api/PluginStatusActions.php and /status/pluginStatus.php endpoints. Successful exploitation permits viewing, adding, modifying, or deleting information in the back-end database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.5.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Battelle V2I Hub is installedLocate and examine the installation directory or running services for Battelle V2I Hub software. Check system inventory or running processes for v2i hub components.Affected if Battelle V2I Hub software is present on the system
-
Verify the installed version is 2.5.1Check the installed version of Battelle V2I Hub by examining version files, about pages, or using any available version inquiry command provided by the application.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.5.1
-
Confirm the affected endpoints existCheck if the web application exposes /api/PluginStatusActions.php and /status/pluginStatus.php endpoints. These are typically found in the web server document root or application directory.Affected if Both endpoints are accessible via the web server
-
Determine if authentication is required for the endpointsAttempt to access the affected endpoints without credentials to verify whether the application enforces authentication.Affected if The endpoints are accessible without authentication or with weak authentication credentials
You are affected if Battelle V2I Hub version 2.5.1 is installed and the jtSorting and id parameters at /api/PluginStatusActions.php or /status/pluginStatus.php are accessible without proper parameterized query protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database queries using the jtSorting and id parameters, apply strict input validation, and ensure the application uses least-privilege database credentials.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1000630 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1000630 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data