CVE-2018-1000866
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.59 and earlier in groovy-sandbox/src/main/java/org/kohsuke/groovy/sandbox/SandboxTransformer.java, groovy-cps/lib/src/main/java/com/cloudbees/groovy/cps/SandboxCpsTransformer.java that allows attackers with Job/Configure permission, or unauthorized attackers with SCM commit privileges and corresponding pipelines based on Jenkinsfiles set up in Jenkins, to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.59 and earlier contains a sandbox bypass vulnerability in the SandboxTransformer and SandboxCpsTransformer components. Attackers with Job/Configure permission or unauthorized attackers with SCM commit privileges to Jenkinsfiles can circumvent Groovy sandbox restrictions and execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.59= 3.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Pipeline: Groovy Plugin versionNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, locate Pipeline: Groovy Plugin in the list and check the Version columnAffected if The installed version is 2.59 or earlier (the version number matches or is lower than the affected range)
-
Confirm Pipeline plugin is presentIn the Jenkins plugin manager, verify that the Pipeline: Groovy Plugin is installed and enabledAffected if The plugin is installed and active in Jenkins
-
Identify Pipeline jobs using Groovy sandboxReview Pipeline job configurations: go to each Pipeline job > Configure > look for 'Use Groovy Sandbox' checkbox in the Pipeline script section or check for 'groovy sandbox' keywords in Jenkinsfile contentAffected if Jobs have the Groovy sandbox option enabled (the checkbox is checked) or Jenkinsfiles contain sandbox-related directives
-
Check Job/Configure permission settingsNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage and Assign Roles > check which users or groups have the Job/Configure permission, or review individual job security settingsAffected if Users or groups beyond administrators have Job/Configure permission enabled
-
Review SCM commit access to repositories with JenkinsfilesInspect the SCM configuration for repositories containing Jenkinsfiles and verify which users have commit/push privileges, particularly for unauthorized or external contributorsAffected if Untrusted or unauthorized users have SCM commit access to Jenkinsfile-containing repositories
A user is affected if the Pipeline: Groovy Plugin version is 2.59 or lower AND Pipeline jobs with Groovy sandbox are in use, especially with overly permissive Job/Configure or SCM commit access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Pipeline: Groovy Plugin to version 2.60 or later to remediate this sandbox bypass vulnerability. Additionally, restrict Job/Configure permission and review SCM commit access to prevent unauthorized pipeline execution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1000866 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1000866 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data