CVE-2018-1002150
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKoji version 1.12, 1.13, 1.14 and 1.15 contain an incorrect access control vulnerability resulting in arbitrary filesystem read/write access. This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 1.12.1, 1.13.1, 1.14.1 and 1.15.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKoji build system versions 1.12-1.15 contain an incorrect access control vulnerability allowing authenticated users to perform arbitrary filesystem read/write operations due to improper permission validation in the filesystem handling code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.12.0= 1.13.0= 1.14.0= 1.15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Koji installationCheck if the Koji build system is installed by looking for the 'koji' command or checking for the presence of /etc/koji.conf or /etc/koji-hub.conf configuration files. On RPM-based systems, run: rpm -qa | grep -i kojiAffected if Koji is not installed or the commands/config files are not found, then this CVE does not apply to your environment.
-
Determine Koji versionRun 'koji --version' or check the RPM package version with 'rpm -qa | grep -i koji' to identify the exact installed versionAffected if The installed version is exactly 1.12.0, 1.13.0, 1.14.0, or 1.15.0, indicating vulnerability to this CVE.
-
Confirm filesystem handling is enabledCheck if the filesystem handling module is enabled by reviewing /etc/koji-hub.conf or /etc/koji.conf for 'fsAlias' or 'filesystem' related configurations. Also check if the 'koji-hub' service is running with filesystem-related tasks enabled.Affected if The filesystem handling feature is configured and active in the Koji environment, which is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Check authentication configurationReview /etc/koji-hub.conf to determine how user authentication is configured. Verify if the system allows authenticated user access. Look for EnableSSLAuth, MaxSessionAge, or similar authentication settings.Affected if The system allows authenticated user sessions (not fully restricted to admin-only), which is a precondition for authenticated users to exploit the access control flaw.
You are affected if Koji is installed with version 1.12.0, 1.13.0, 1.14.0, or 1.15.0 and the filesystem handling feature is enabled for authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImmediately upgrade Koji to versions 1.12.1, 1.13.1, 1.14.1, or 1.15.1 or later to patch the access control flaw. Review user access permissions and audit system logs for signs of exploitation given the critical CVSS score.
Upgrade to Koji version 1.15.1 (or the corresponding 1.12.1, 1.13.1, or 1.14.1 for your respective base version)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Koji version using: rpm -q koji or pip show koji
- 2. Backup the current Koji installation and database
- 3. Upgrade Koji to the fixed version using the appropriate package manager command: yum update koji (for RHEL/CentOS) or pip install --upgrade koji
- 4. Verify the new version is installed: rpm -q koji or pip show koji
- 5. Restart the Koji hub and related services: systemctl restart httpd (or your web server) and any koji-* services
- 6. Test that the Koji instance is functioning correctly and that the arbitrary filesystem read/write vulnerability is no longer present
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1002150 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1002150 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data