Enterprise File SharingApplication · Vaultize

CVE-2018-10212

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Vaultize Enterprise File Sharing 17.05.31. There is improper authorization leading to creation of folders within another account via a modified device value.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Vaultize Enterprise File Sharing 17.05.31. The application fails to properly validate that the device parameter in folder creation requests belongs to the authenticated user's account, allowing an attacker to create folders within another user's account by manipulating this value.

MitigationImplement server-side authorization checks to verify the device/account association before allowing folder creation, and enforce proper session validation on all sensitive operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Enterprise File SharingApplication
Affected:= 17.05.31

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm installed version of Vaultize Enterprise File Sharing
    Locate the Vaultize installation directory and check the version file, or access the application's About/Version information page in the web interface
    Affected if Installed version is exactly 17.05.31
  2. Identify folder creation API endpoint
    Review the application's web request logs or intercept a legitimate folder creation request using a proxy tool to identify the endpoint and parameters (particularly the device parameter)
    Affected if The folder creation endpoint accepts a device parameter without server-side validation of device ownership
  3. Test for authorization bypass on folder creation
    Create two test accounts, obtain a valid session for the first account, then attempt to create a folder while specifying a device identifier that belongs to the second account
    Affected if Folder creation succeeds with a device ID from another user's account without proper ownership validation
  4. Check server-side authorization validation
    Review application source code or configuration files for the folder creation handler to verify it validates device-to-user ownership before processing the request
    Affected if No validation exists that confirms the device parameter belongs to the authenticated user session

A user is affected if Vaultize Enterprise File Sharing version 17.05.31 is installed and the folder creation endpoint accepts a device parameter without verifying it belongs to the authenticated user's account.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement server-side authorization checks to verify the device/account association before allowing folder creation, and enforce proper session validation on all sensitive operations.

Fix this in Enterprise File Sharing Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-10212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-10212 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data