CVE-2018-10228
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in /application/controller/admin/theme.php in LimeSurvey 3.6.2+180406 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the changes_cp parameter to the index.php/admin/themes/sa/templatesavechanges URI.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLimeSurvey 3.6.2+180406 contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the theme administration controller (theme.php). The vulnerability exists in the 'changes_cp' parameter when processing the /index.php/admin/themes/sa/templatesavechanges endpoint. Attackers can inject arbitrary JavaScript or HTML that executes in the context of an authenticated administrator's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify LimeSurvey installationLocate LimeSurvey installation directories, typically under web root paths like /var/www/html/limesurvey, /var/www/limesurvey, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\limesurvey. Look for the main index.php file and the application structure.Affected if LimeSurvey is installed on the system
-
Check installed LimeSurvey versionOpen the file application/config/version.php or check the VERSION file in the LimeSurvey root directory. Alternatively, look at the footer of the LimeSurvey admin interface after logging in.Affected if The installed version is 3.6.2 (specifically 3.6.2+180406)
-
Locate the theme.php controllerNavigate to application/controllers/admin/ and locate theme.php. Verify the file exists and check its modification date.Affected if The theme.php controller file exists in the expected path
-
Verify the affected endpoint existsCheck for the existence of the templatesavechanges action within theme.php. Look for a function named templatesavechanges or similar that handles the /index.php/admin/themes/sa/templatesavechanges endpoint.Affected if The templatesavechanges function exists in theme.php and processes the changes_cp parameter
-
Check if admin authentication is requiredReview the theme.php controller for access control decorators or beforeAction methods that enforce administrator role requirements for the affected endpoint.Affected if The endpoint requires admin authentication, meaning an attacker needs a valid admin session
The environment is affected if LimeSurvey version 3.6.2 is installed and the theme.php controller with the vulnerable templatesavechanges endpoint is present and accessible to authenticated administrators.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the changes_cp parameter in theme.php. All user-supplied data should be sanitized before storage and HTML-encoded before rendering to prevent script execution.
Latest stable LimeSurvey 3.x or 6.x release (verify fix in release notes)
- 1. Back up your current LimeSurvey installation and database before any upgrade.
- 2. Download the latest stable version of LimeSurvey from the official GitHub repository (github.com/LimeSurvey/LimeSurvey).
- 3. Review the release notes for versions after 3.6.2 to confirm the XSS fix for the theme.php changes_cp parameter vulnerability.
- 4. Replace the application files with the new version, preserving your configuration and upload directory.
- 5. Run the database upgrade script if required by the new version.
- 6. Test the application functionality, particularly the theme management area at /admin/themes/sa/templatesavechanges.
- 7. Verify the fix by attempting to inject script via the changes_cp parameter - it should be properly escaped.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-10228 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-10228 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data