CVE-2018-10590
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Advantech WebAccess versions V8.2_20170817 and prior, WebAccess versions V8.3.0 and prior, WebAccess Dashboard versions V.2.0.15 and prior, WebAccess Scada Node versions prior to 8.3.1, and WebAccess/NMS 2.0.3 and prior, an information exposure vulnerability through directory listing has been identified, which may allow an attacker to find important files that are not normally visible.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdvantech WebAccess SCADA software contains an information disclosure vulnerability where directory listing is enabled on the web server, allowing unauthenticated attackers to enumerate files and directories that should not be publicly accessible. This can reveal configuration files, credentials, or other sensitive system information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 8.2_20170817<= 8.3.0<= 2.0.15< 8.3.1<= 2.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Advantech WebAccess installation and versionLocate the WebAccess installation directory, typically under C:\Advantech\WebAccess or C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\WAD. Check for version information in the about dialog, README files, or installation logs. Compare the found version against the affected ranges: WebAccess <= 8.2_20170817, <= 8.3.0, or < 8.3.1; Dashboard <= 2.0.15; Webaccess/nms <= 2.0.3.Affected if The installed version is any of 8.2_20170817 or earlier, 8.3.0 or earlier, or below 8.3.1 for WebAccess SCADA; Dashboard version 2.0.15 or earlier; or Webaccess/nms 2.0.3 or earlier.
-
Identify the web server componentDetermine whether the system uses IIS or another web server for hosting WebAccess. Check the Windows Services list for IIS Admin Service or examine the web server configuration files in the WebAccess installation directory.Affected if IIS or Apache is configured to serve the WebAccess web application.
-
Verify directory listing is enabledCheck the web server configuration (IIS Manager under Directory Browsing, or httpd.conf/htaccess for Apache) to see if directory listing is permitted. Alternatively, attempt to access a known directory path such as /webaccess/ or the root web directory without an index file to see if a directory listing is returned.Affected if Directory listing is enabled on any web directory under the WebAccess application path.
-
Test for sensitive file exposureAttempt to access common paths that may reveal sensitive information, such as configuration directories, backup folders, or log directories within the WebAccess web root. Examples include paths like /scada/, /config/, /backup/, or parent directories. Observe if a full directory listing is returned showing file contents.Affected if Directory listing is returned and reveals configuration files, credentials, or other sensitive system files that should not be publicly accessible.
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed Advantech WebAccess versions AND the web server has directory listing enabled, allowing unauthenticated enumeration of files and directories.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data8.3.1
Disable directory listing in the web server configuration (IIS/Apache) and apply vendor patches for the specific affected versions. Restrict access to sensitive files via proper access controls.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-10590 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-10590 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data