CVE-2018-1061
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedpython before versions 2.7.15, 3.4.9, 3.5.6rc1, 3.6.5rc1 and 3.7.0 is vulnerable to catastrophic backtracking in the difflib.IS_LINE_JUNK method. An attacker could use this flaw to cause denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePython before versions 2.7.15, 3.4.9, 3.5.6rc1, 3.6.5rc1 and 3.7.0 contains a regular expression vulnerability in the difflib.IS_LINE_JUNK method susceptible to catastrophic backtracking, allowing attackers to cause denial of service through specially crafted input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.7.15>= 3.0, < 3.4.9>= 3.5.0, <= 3.5.5>= 3.6, <= 3.6.4= 3.7.0= 8.0= 9.0= 3.3= 7.0= 7.0= 7.0= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04= 18.04= 28= 29= 30CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Python versionRun 'python --version' or 'python3 --version' in the target environment's shellAffected if The version is less than 2.7.15, or between 3.0 and 3.4.8 inclusive, or between 3.5.0 and 3.5.5 inclusive, or between 3.6.0 and 3.6.4 inclusive, or exactly 3.7.0
-
Locate all Python installationsRun 'which python' and 'which python3' to find executable paths; check package manager listings (dpkg -l, rpm -qa, apt list) for python packagesAffected if Any Python installation matches the affected version ranges listed above
-
Check for difflib usage in deployed codeSearch source code repositories and deployed applications for imports of 'difflib' and references to 'IS_LINE_JUNK' or 'SequenceMatcher' using grep or code scanning toolsAffected if Code imports and uses difflib with user-supplied input to the IS_LINE_JUNK method
-
Identify applications using vulnerable Python interpretersReview application dependency manifests, container images, virtual environments, and system Python installations to determine which Python versions they ship or referenceAffected if Applications run on or bundle a Python interpreter matching the affected versions
A system is affected if it runs any Python version less than 2.7.15, 3.4.9, 3.5.6rc1, 3.6.5rc1, or 3.7.1 and executes code that leverages the difflib.IS_LINE_JUNK method with untrusted regular expression input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.7.153.4.9
Upgrade Python to version 2.7.15, 3.4.9, 3.5.6rc1, 3.6.5rc1, 3.7.0 or later to patch the vulnerability in difflib.IS_LINE_JUNK.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1061 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- bugs.python.org
- docs.python.org
- docs.python.org
- www.securitytracker.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- lists.debian.org
- lists.debian.org
- usn.ubuntu.com
- usn.ubuntu.com
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- lists.opensuse.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- support.hpe.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1061 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data