CVE-2018-10635
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Universal Robots Robot Controllers Version CB 3.1, SW Version 3.4.5-100, ports 30001/TCP to 30003/TCP listen for arbitrary URScript code and execute the code. This enables a remote attacker who has access to the ports to remotely execute code that may allow root access to be obtained.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Universal Robots CB 3.1 controllers running SW 3.4.5-100. TCP ports 30001-30003 accept arbitrary URScript commands and execute them without authentication, potentially with root privileges, allowing complete compromise of the robot controller.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.4.5-100CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify firmware versionAccess the robot controller's web interface or use the PolyScope HMI to navigate to Settings > System > About. Alternatively, connect to the controller via SSH and run 'cat /etc/version' or check the 'urcontrol.conf' file.Affected if The firmware version is exactly 3.4.5-100
-
Verify TCP ports 30001-30003 are listeningFrom a network-connected host, run 'nmap -p 30001,30002,30003 <controller_ip>' or use 'netstat -an | grep 3000' on the controller itself to confirm the ports are in LISTEN state.Affected if One or more of ports 30001, 30002, or 30003 are open and accepting connections
-
Confirm URScript interface accepts unauthenticated commandsSend a simple URScript command (e.g., 'textmsg("test")') via netcat or Python socket to port 30001 without providing any credentials: 'echo "textmsg(\"test\")" | nc <controller_ip> 30001'.Affected if The command executes and returns a response without requiring authentication
-
Check network accessibility of controller portsAttempt an outbound TCP connection to ports 30001-30003 from an untrusted network segment. Use 'telnet <controller_ip> 30001' or 'nc -zv <controller_ip> 30001-30003'.Affected if The ports are reachable from a network outside the intended operational VLAN
-
Verify no authentication mechanism is enforcedReview the controller's network security settings via the web dashboard or PolyScope under Settings > Network > Remote Control. Confirm that 'Authentication required' is not enabled for the Dashboard server on ports 29999-30001.Affected if Remote URScript execution is enabled without authentication enforcement
A system is affected if it is a Universal Robots CB 3.1 controller running firmware version 3.4.5-100 with TCP ports 30001-30003 accessible and the URScript interface accepting unauthenticated commands.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedIsolate robot controllers on a restricted VLAN with firewall rules blocking unauthorized access to ports 30001-30003; if the URScript interface is not required for operations, disable it or apply vendor patches.
Universal Robots CB series firmware version with authentication enabled (contact vendor for specific version)
- Identify all Universal Robots CB 3.1 controllers running SW version 3.4.5-100 on the network
- Verify network accessibility to ports 30001/TCP, 30002/30003 on affected devices
- Restrict network access to ports 30001-30003 using firewall rules or network segmentation to prevent unauthorized external access
- Contact Universal Robots for the latest firmware version that addresses CVE-2018-10635
- Schedule maintenance window for firmware upgrade
- After upgrade, verify that authentication is required for URScript execution on ports 30001-30003
- Confirm ports are no longer accessible from untrusted networks
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-10635 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-10635 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data