Enterprise LinuxOperating system · Redhat

CVE-2018-1079

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.9.164 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
pcs before version 0.9.164 and 0.10 is vulnerable to a privilege escalation via authorized user malicious REST call. The REST interface of the pcsd service did not properly sanitize the file name from the /remote/put_file query. If the /etc/booth directory exists, an authenticated attacker with write permissions could create or overwrite arbitrary files with arbitrary data outside of the /etc/booth directory, in the context of the pcsd process.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The pcsd REST interface has a path traversal vulnerability in the /remote/put_file endpoint that fails to sanitize file paths properly. An authenticated attacker with write permissions can use this to create or overwrite arbitrary files outside the intended /etc/booth directory by manipulating path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../etc/cron.d) in the file name parameter.

MitigationUpgrade pcs to version 0.9.164 or 0.10 or later to obtain the patched version. As a compensating control, ensure the /etc/booth directory does not exist if immediate upgrade is not feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Enterprise LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 7.0= 7.5
Pacemaker Command Line InterfaceApplication
Affected:<= 0.9.164= 0.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify pcs package is installed
    Run 'rpm -q pcs' or 'which pcs' to check if the pcs package is present on the system
    Affected if pcs package is not installed - the vulnerability does not apply
  2. Determine installed pcs version
    Run 'rpm -q --qf "%{VERSION}\n" pcs' to get the installed version number, then compare against affected versions <= 0.9.164 or = 0.10
    Affected if Installed version is 0.9.164 or earlier, or exactly 0.10
  3. Check if pcsd service is running
    Run 'systemctl status pcsd' or check if port 2224 is listening (pcs daemon by default listens on this port)
    Affected if pcsd service is not running - the vulnerable REST interface is not exposed
  4. Inspect /etc/booth directory existence
    Run 'ls -la /etc/booth' to check if this directory exists on the system
    Affected if Directory /etc/booth exists - this is the intended target directory for the put_file endpoint, and existence of this directory indicates the feature is in use
  5. Check pcsd authentication configuration
    Review /etc/pcsd/pcsd.conf or check if authentication is required for REST API access (default requires authentication)
    Affected if pcsd accepts authenticated requests - an attacker with valid credentials could exploit the path traversal

A system is affected by CVE-2018-1079 if pcs/pcsd is installed with version 0.9.164 or earlier (or exactly 0.10), the pcsd service is running and accessible, and an attacker could obtain authenticated access to the /remote/put_file endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.9.164
Interim mitigation

Upgrade pcs to version 0.9.164 or 0.10 or later to obtain the patched version. As a compensating control, ensure the /etc/booth directory does not exist if immediate upgrade is not feasible.

Fix this in Enterprise Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1079 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1079 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data